Categories: FeaturedNews

Sheezan Khan’s bail plea rejected; Family decides to move High court

The bail plea of accused Sheezan Khan in Tunisha Sharma suicide case has been rejected by the Vasai court. Sheezan Khan’s lawyer and his family was expecting for the bail to be granted today but it was rejected. Neither the lawyer nor the family of Sheezanspoke to the media after their exit. However, the grapevines are abuzz that the family has moved the High Court to seek justice.

Tunisha’s lawyer Advocate Tarun Sharma told the media that the judge has rejected the bail application of Sheezan Khan. He said that it was the family of Sheezzan who was creating different theories to stop the truth from coming out.

He said, “When Sheezan was arrested on 24th December, they started with different theories of fake chacha, fake mama, fake mother and then they got in Ali. This was rejected by the court today. They wanted to tarnish the family’s image and not let them get any support from the media or police. Court observed that they had no evidence for their arguments.”

He was also asked about the matter going to the High Court now. To this, he replied, “I am prepared to take the case even till the Supreme court.

Tunisha’s mama said, “To get Tunisha justice, we’d go to not just the High Court but also the Supreme Court. Ali’s statements have been taken by the investigative agencies. It’s clear that he was just a friend. She had met him in December 2 to 3 times. I would not like to get into the details. The investigative agencies have all the details about who talked in the last 15 minutes to her and before that. Sheezan was with Tunisha for the last 35 minutes and it has been made clear by the investigation agencies to the court. So there’s no use of mentioning Ali’s name.”

He also added, “From the first day, Sheezan has been changing his statements. Sometimes he forgets passwords, then he cites different reasons for break-up, he also refers to the Shraddha Aftab case. His bail has been rejected on the grounds of him manipulating witnesses and destroying evidence.”

Share
Published by