Anupama 27th October 2021 Written Episode Update: Nandini’s Advice For Vanraj

Anupama 27th October 2021 Written Episode, Written Update on TellyUpdates.com

Anuj tells Anupama that he had many girls in his life, some as friend, some as girlfriend, some as a night companion. He met many and had affairs, but couldn’t love anyone; its not that those girls had something missing in them, he couldn’t love them and it would have been injustice to the girls if he had married one of them; usually one falls in love after marriage, but what if it doesn’t there is one-sided love in marriage. Anu remembers Vanraj’s betrayal. Anuj says he would have married, but couldn’t as he didn’t want to take risk. She says he can marry even now as he doesn’t look more than 30, rich, and handsome; he should marry as everyone needs a life partner. He laughs and mimicking Salman Khan says there are 2 kind of people, one can be married and sad and other can be unmarried and happy, he chose to be happy. She laughs. He says he had a bad luck in love, but he has learnt to live happily. She continues laughing. He asks when she told everyone needs a life partner, then why don’t she marry. She says she doesn’t need a life partner.

Vanraj writhes with leg pain and headache. Nandini gives him pain killer. He thanks her. She says feels bad when he hurts Anu and hurts himself in the process and gives an example of a kid playing in a dirt. She says a lot happened in this house recently and she feels it was just a built up and real drama will start now, he should handle it if it happens.

Anu tells Anuj that she doesn’t have a place for a life partner in her life, not because she is a mother of grown up children, but because she doesn’t have courage to love or bear pain as she did it once and can’t again. She says one can tolerate a young age love, but cannot a mature age love; she gathered herself with great difficulty, but can’t again. He mimics Salman Khan again and says she is right and should join Mamaji’s single’s club membership; as he said she can be happily unmarried than unhappily married. She laughs again. He sasy can they go now after his bad mimicry. She says yes. They pray god again and return to car. Ek Duje Ke Vaaste.. song plays in the background. Climate changes. Back in car, Anu messages Bapuji that they are leaving and will reach home by evening. Rain starts. Anu says its an unseasonal rain like cooking competition day. He says he can’t see roads due to heavy rain.

Family gets concerned for Anu. Pakhi asks Toshu about Kinjal. Toshu says she has gone to Mumbai for conference. Bapuji says Anu messaged that she will return by evening. Samar says her phone is not reachable. Anuj’s car gets stuck. He tries to make a call, but doesn’t find network. She says its heavily raining and even her phone doesn’t have a network. He says he will go out and check and asks her to be in car. She says they both will go out together and jokes giving example of a movie. He offers her umbrella. She asks if he is waterproof. He says he is also not made of salt. He holds umbrella and gets her out. She slips. He holds her and drops umbrella. They get drenched. He removes his blazer and drapes it over her. She remembers seeing a house nearby and reminds him discussing about it. He says he remembers. She asks is it. He murmurs he remembers her each word. They both head towards the house.

Bapuji speaks to GK over phone and assures him that Anuj would be fine. Vanraj gets worried for Anu. Baa with a frowning face asks what is he blabbering. Samar says its better for mummy and Anuj to stay in a hotel than driving in rain. Baa determines to punish Anu if she doesn’t return home today. Anu and Anuj reach a hope and ring bell hoping they can make a call from there. Two boys half open door. Anuj requests to let them make a call. Boys says they can’t trust strangers and cannot allow them in. Anu says they are right as she also taught children not to trust strangers. Anuj asks them to check his name on internet. They check and get excited seeing him and say they were partying with friends in their guest house. They take them in and introduce famous NRI businessman Anuj Kapadia to their friends. Anuj apologizes for disturbing their party. Anu calls from landline and informs Bapuji that they are stuck in rain and reached a house. Samar suggests to stay there tonight as there is a cloud burst int that area. Vanraj, Toshu, and Baa frown hearing that.

Precap: Anu and Anuj dance with youngsters. Vanraj calls landline and enquires about Anupama. Boy says uncle and aunty are resting in a room. Vanraj gets angry and waits to humiliate Anu. Kavya provokes him.

Update Credit to: MA

85 Comments
  1. @R Shankar, hv few questions for you buddy.
    Your name suggests you are Indian Hindu. Do you celebrate Indian festivals Shiva Ratri, Ram Navami, Krishna janmastami and so on? If you don’t celebrate also, are you against it?

    1. What is your point

    2. @Anonymous, give me the answer, I promise, will put my points across. Do you celebrate the festivities?

    3. Yeah I celebrate Diwali pongal krishna jayanti and tamil new year
      Give the context in which you are asking this question

    4. Still waiting for your reasoning in asking that question

    5. @R Shankar, your name suggests you folks are devoted to Lord Shiva.
      Trust me Lord Shiva should have been in jail for beheading own son for obeying his mother. Vanraj is a better father.
      Lord Rama should be in custody for abetting mata Sita’s suicide, he should be in jail for mental torture asking her to pass through fire. He is not at all a husband element.
      Lord Krishna is a jovial lord who could win all women in his time. When you celebrate Krishna Jayanti why u want society to protest when Anupama stays in her own house post divorce? Vanraj is guilty he should go out, Why Anupama need to move out of her own house?
      I am regressive still I dare to ask these questions, you are progressive why are you celebrating the figures who are worse than Vanraj.?

      Answer—[email protected] society, age and culture matters.
      Our culture has taught us to obey without questioning. Sita, Rama, Krishna, Shiva, Sati are our ideal.
      So we are celebrating them without questioning them.
      Anyone who tried to deviate was trolled, some one sympathetic towards wife is called Joru ka Ghulam.
      Till date in my native, men don’t hold their own kids, enter kitchen its considered as woman’s job.
      DIL’s family shouldn’t be given water also rather they are supposed to bring best in class gifts for all members in house while visiting her.
      These traditions are followed till date, anyone trying to deviate will be isolated, trolled, mocked mostly in rural areas.
      Though we are stationed in urban areas, we still root back to our villages and it impacts.
      It hurts when you say Baa and Vanraj are useless and cant be changed. Men in my house are like Vanraj and women are all tolerant Anupama.
      Trust me I like Ravanraj more than Ramraj. Ravan never mistreated his wife/wives/mata Sita.
      To avenge surpanakha’s nose cut, he kidnapped Sita thats all.
      But what our ideal did? he never punished his mother’s greed or father’s weakness or partiality, rather killed Ravana and left Sita for no reason.
      If we weigh Vanraj or Baa with these ideologies, they are perfect, in fact better than many.
      Now our thinking is changing, why cant they change?

    6. Intentions differ the lords and Vanraj.
      The Lords are pure..no negativity whereas Vanraj has full of negativity.
      Rama didn’t asked Sita to walk on fire. She herself take the challenge to prove her innocence to outsiders whereas Vanraj, Baa treat Anupama more harshly than Outsiders do.

      Krishna never told Gopis to love him. It was thier kindness that they love him so much. And so he love them back cause they deserve. There was no BF-GF or Dating or Marriage then. Krishna or lord Vishnu always committed to Maa Lakshmi whereas Vanraj, Kavya can Side change anytime..they are very unstable.

      Joru ka gulaam called when a man needs to follow every step after marriage. He don’t have his own command to his life. All he do is what his Wife says.

      It’s never Urban and Rural
      It’s always the half sided knowledge.
      People follow niyams, rituals but hardly some now the significance. People know that Lord Shiv beheaded Ganesh but doesn’t see that this made Ganesha so special and so auspicious.
      Every karm has its consequences
      What matters is intentions and Words.
      Yes Words.

      I am in support with the idea that Vanraj Baa change.
      But they cannot change.
      They need to reform and it will only happen when they will break. And they will break when All there Ego, expectations, anger ends.

    7. Again you are wrong. All the festivals are basically social gatherings and a chance to meet our dear and dear ones nothing beyond that. Your comparison of two situations are entirely misplaced ram never suspected sita. Till British came to India and banned sati we had women dying with their husbands was it a good practice.

      Sooner or later rationalism will overpower religion.
      To compare lord Ram or krishna with vanraj is pure nonsense made only to argue for the sake of arguing.
      Vanraj being a good should father is a joke of the century. On the contrary his children are more tolerant with him which child will tolerate their father bring another woman in the house and humilate their beloved mother Frankly I find children not hating their father for ill treating their mother itself as illogical children always support their mother father is respected only till the time he’s good to their mother. If he brings any other women that’ll be the end of that respect for him hate starts.
      Finally I find shah house itself as a evil workshop. How can the parents support a woman being assaulted. Really shameful house.

    8. Totally agree with you @R Shankar

    9. Hi Shankar,

      I understand you have tried your best to defend yourself against an uncalled for and ill informed attack by some online stranger who knows nothing about the culture you belong to, just because of your name. We’ve all been there. More power to you.

      But there’s something amiss in your explanation. You don’t have to be apologetic about anything you’ve mentioned above. Because neither Sati nor Dowry belong to Sanatan Dharma.

      If Sathi pratha was integral to Sanatan Dharma, why didn’t all 3 wives of Raja Dasharath commit Sati?..Why didn’t Kunti or Ambika or Ambalika from Mahabharata commit Sati after the death of their Husbands?..Madri died because she strongly believed that she was the reason for Pandus death and chose to die with her husband. No one forced her. Then how did Sati come into existence – Note very carefully that Sati Pratha existed mainly in Rajasthan and nearby regions – That was due to the Mughal invaders and their ilk. Once the Indic Kings died in wars against these invaders, their queens were taken by these foreign invaders into ‘Harams’ – They would rape them and take them as slaves to their Brothels called ‘Harams’. Hence the Sanatani woman preferred to die with honor on their husbands death to save themselves from those invaders. This is exactly the reason for early child marriages – to save their kids from these invaders. These overtime turned into traditions though the requirement for such rituals ultimately ended. So the British did not civilise the poor unwashed masses of India like you think so..Their arrival merely overpowered the existing invaders and hence stopped those regressive practices…These invaders came to India because of the Riches and Glory it had. Read about Vijayanagara kingdom, Cholas, Pandavas…

      Similarly, Dowry wasn’t a Sanatan Dharma invention, Women had ‘Stree-Dhan’ on getting married. Stree-Dhan literally means the wealth of the Woman. It belonged to her. The Dowry practice also has been imported to this country by these foreign invaders.

      If interested, I would suggest you to read the book “India that is Bharat”. Might help you unlearn and look beyond the Colonial lense our education system gives us.

      Festivals are not merely for people to meet and greet. They are for us to understand what the dieties stand for – To learn their virtues and imbibe them in our lives in the true sense. It’s surreal when we start to understand this quintessential relationship between Bhagwan and Bhakta in Sanatan Dharma.

      Dhanyawad 🙏

      P.S – Be proud of your name and Own it. You are named after someone who was the first in the world to teach what ‘Yoga, Meditation and Detachment’ is. All that which is the fad and cool stuff today. Sadly people don’t even acknowledge this Magical boon of Sanatan Dharma while creating fictional stories to disrepute it.

    10. Again Impressive.

    11. LMAO. 😂

      The result of learning about your history and culture from movies is right here at display in this comment. And not to forget the pitiful one sided biased show of wrong analysis and interpretations. I am so sure you wouldn’t have read a single page of the Bhagavad Gita or Valmiki Ramayana.

      I’m not sure about which religion you belong to after your ‘Ameen Summa Ameen’ comment…But giving you the benefit of doubt and assuming you to belong to Sanatan Dharma, Here’s a detailed reply to you misinterpretations Miss Subha.

      1. Ravana just kidnapped Sita to avenge Surpanakhas insult?…LOL… Surpanakha misled Ravana and enticed him by telling him about a beautiful woman called Sita who should be his wife and not a forest wanderers wife…so he should go get her..
      Pls answer – If Ravan loved his sister so much why did he kill her Husband…
      P.S – Wondering how would you defend Surpanakhas act of harassing Bhagavan Rama and threatening to kill Mata Sita if he doesn’t accept her, by your standards of Feminism if there was a role reversal and Surpanakha was a male character and not a female one…

      2. Ravana didn’t touch Mata sita – Oh so merciful!!..Is it?
      Ever read Valmiki Ramayana?.. Ravana was cursed that if he forced himself on a woman without her permission, his head would blast into pieces. He was given this curse when he raped an Apsara named Rambha…Still love ‘Ravanraj’?

      3. Not everything in life is about a Romantic relationship as Husband/Wife…BF/GF….If you do not understand or have never tried to learn what ‘Bhakti’ or Devotion is, better stay off the limits on that before you compare Gods with some fictional negative characters.

      4. Bhagavan Shiva – If you do not understand the theological relationship on how Lord Ganesha, before he became ‘Lord Ganesha’ was very proud of himself and arrogant. When his head was later replaced by the same Lord Shiva, he learnt his mistake and is now worshipped as the one with most Wisdom.
      To satisfy your ‘feminist’ agenda – Let me tell you, Lord Ganesha was brought back to life because Maa Parvati threatened to destroy the Universe if she didn’t get her son back. All the Gods bowed before her and found the solution to calm her anger. Ever saw any other culture where a woman is this powerful?…Go search on how she is revered and prayed for 9 days, twice a year. It’s called ‘Navratri’ – The celebration of the Divine Feminine. Also learn about ‘Shakta’ school of Hinduism

      4. Bhagavan Krishna – Again, Gopis are not Girlfriends!…You have such a narrow lense from which you look at world and the relationships within – Especially about a Human – God relationship. Gopis are simply woman who have devoted and surrendered their life to Krishna. You’ll find a lot of Krishna Bhaktas even today calling themselves Dasi/Gopi of Shri Krishna. Similarly you’ll find ‘Dasa’ – Men who devote their lives to Shri Krishna!…It’s not something a non Bhakta can ever relate or understand…

      5. You seem to be so obsessed with your wrong analysis of the Male dieties that you conveniently forget about the power of feminine worship in Sanatan Dharma. Go search every religion you know of and see where a woman is worshipped this way. Good luck!

      Women in Sanatan Dharma:

      Sita Mata had a ‘Swayamvar’ – She chose her Husband!

      Mata Kaikaiyee – Bhagavan Rams Step mother whom you accuse of being Greedy received the 2 promises to be fulfilled Vow from Raja Janak when she saved him in a WAR. She went to war with her husband. Look at that Patriarchal society, tch tch, he sent his son to forest for 14 years on a word given to a woman…How patriarchal!!!…

      Bhagavan Shiva did not wish to Marry, he was a Viyogi, the one disconnected from worldly relationships. It was Mata Sati who did intense Tapa to convince him to marry her. This was the freedom woman had. Also, go search how did ‘Shakti peeth’ come into existence. Will show you Bhagavan Shiva’s love for Mata Sati.

      Krishna saved Draupadi – The show you watch and commented on, has explained it to you before me, how they must be the first case of friendship between Man and woman known to world.

      If certain sections of the current day ‘modern’ society does something wrong calling them traditions/rituals it’s about them current day humans being wrong. It’s about them being factually wrong about understanding Sanatan Dharma just like you.

      My humble advice if you’re actually a Sanatan Dharmi – Please go and read scriptures with a open mind, understand the multiple dimensions of relationships that exists and not just from a Masculine or Feminine or Romantic perspectives. And most importantly- STOP LEARNING ABOUT SANATAN DHARMA FROM MOVIES, TV SHOWS OR RANDOM INSTAGRAM POSTS. Dhanyawad. 🙏

      Wishing you Shanti and Sadbudhhi.

    12. Hats off @VK

    13. U have full knowledge.
      I love it. I know this details but I didn’t write much cuz it would be too much lengthy.
      Love you yaar

    14. @Amar, How do you know GOD is pure? GOD is pure, impure, true, false, exist, non exist everything.
      Lord Rama forced her to prove her, when he forced for second time, mata Sita committed suicide.
      Vanraj didnt fall for Kavya, he was so talented, and helping that Kavya fell for him and he loved her in return 😉
      Vanraj also has pure intentions when he insults Samar, he wants him to win and worshiped everywhere. Done?
      Love is the only way to end ego, selfishness and anger. Other methods can suppress but can’t omit.
      Vanraj has already suffered, lost job, met accident and regretted to lose Anupama.
      Its fine if he and Baa regrets more, But they have to change otherwise our society wont change.

    15. God’s mann is pure.
      U again mistaken. U could figure it out by yourself.

      And who told you rubbish that Rama forced Sita to give Exam?
      Rama always supported Sita and he confident that Sita is so pure that even Agni can’t touch it.
      You misunderstood it.

      Vanraj just yells. If he cares Samar then he should talk less help more. Vanraj created problems more than he supported.
      See I don’t ignore the good deeds while mentioning bad deeds but if you see, Vanraj did more Sins than boons. He only boast his boons and not redeem most of his sins.

      And as u seen Mahabharata also, there Krishna said before War that Duryodhan is also his part.. He too cares and it’s necessary to kill him cause he is at that point from where he cannot change. A new birth is needed or else he would suffer the worst of worst in this birth.

      Same goes with Baa, Vanraj. They have changed till now if they are to change but they didn’t… So next step is to break them and then reform them again.

    16. Take another example of making of an Earthen pot.
      U can blend, give shape or change shape only upto the point it gets hard totally.

      Once it gets dried and tough u can’t make changes. U have to crush it, drench it and then make all from start.

      Same condition with Baa and Vanraj and Kavya. They are the hard, unchangeable pots. That is, they made their minds hard that whatever they are doing is 100% correct no doubt.
      You cannot change such mind.
      What it can be done is Reform.

      I will not explain more. It’s upto you now

    17. @Amar, again when our society allowed to have half knowledge or full knowledge, it just imposed with strict society rules. You don’t agree?
      There is a saying which says [Putrathe kriyate bharya], that means u can abandon wife if she doesn’t deliver a son.
      I literally wish one generation shd abort all girls to deliver males to enjoy and extinct.
      There is a incident in Ramayana, where Lord Rama had given death sentence to one lower caste sudra muni as they cant do tapas. And in the similar incident Karna was cursed in Mahabharata.
      When the society is so strict, how one can go against and think on own?
      This generation has started thinking and arguing having its own consequences!

    18. Half knowledge is very dangerous.
      Example, u can abandon wife if she can’t deliver. This is a piece of knowledge.

      Question it Why?
      Question them that what if man is infertile?

      Where are the answers of these?? God knows😂.
      So this is called Half Knowledge.

      Why don’t people arise these questions? Cause they fear alot. Thats makes their mann unsteady and this unsteady mind makes them do Sins
      Like Baa is doing here.
      She fears society more than she loves Anu and so she doing sins over sins.

      The Day her Fear will disappear, the day she will feel the lost love for Anu and this will help her to reform.
      As u said Love will help to change.

    19. Currently Baa is under control of her insecurities. It’s like a disorder and for her well, she needs a Slap of Truth.
      A slap from her own sins

    20. Also karna got a genuine punishment from his teacher. That’s also the biggest teaching for him.

    21. @R Shankar, may be u r brought up else where in India.
      But Anupama and me face similar situation.
      Society has given rights to suspect women. And same thing Anupama said during Ravan dahan.
      When did I say Sati was a good tradition to follow?
      I am thankful to British and Raja Ram mohan Roy for that. And trust me while eradicating it whole society was against them.
      Society was worst few decades ago. Its changing, We have to show the change instead of saying it cant change.
      I never said Vanraj was correct to bring another wife, I just said society and we ourselves are tolerant towards men to have multiple wives and we don’t hesitate to worship such men. But we cant tolerate women doing so.
      Why Rama/Krishna/Shiva are above comparison? This is the attitude where no one questions and follow.
      Vanraj is a better father compared to Lord Shiva and normally in Indian households typical fathers are like Vanraj.
      I am again saying you must be from a different place which I am not aware.
      Good to know that festivals are social gatherings and in our place we read books or discuss about the incidents related to festival, which says men to be adamant like Shiva/Rama/Krishna and instruct women to follow mute eh.

    22. I also agree with you folks @Jazz/@Amar/@R Shankar, but what I am trying to say is, it a mass problem/ society problem like Sati/Child marriage, where the society need to change instead of individuals?
      How about white washing Lord Shiva/Rama/Krishna’s character? Or stop praising when the husband who can leave pregnant wife when any xyz accuses.
      I think u ppl wont agree to whitewash them.

    23. Here is a simple thing @Subha
      When you’re comparing a person with anyone like God, human or animals just remember one thing
      If you’re comparing their sins never forget to compare their goodness either

      Your justification doesn’t make sense because you’re comparing Vanraj to Gods whose good deeds exceed their any questionable deeds by a whole good margin

      A person is good or not depends on the ratio of goodness to badness within that person

      Vanraj and Baa have more bad deeds than good
      That’s why they are evil

      Gods (who were born as humans or lived with humans) have inhumanly way more good deeds than questionable ones and that’s why they’re worshipped

      I believe they have questionable deeds to make us realize the beauty of imperfections that we’ll never get rid of.

      Forget about god
      Even if you’re comparing two people remember to compare the ratio rather than only good or bad deed

      If I’ll say a Don who kills hundreds of people is better than you only because he donated more than you to poor or took care of more stray animals than you did then that won’t make sense right?

    24. @Subha – your dumdum ignorant Subha – your nonsense crap analysis of Hindu mythological legends, lol, I added a comment separately! So dumdum, Subha, do you know the difference between proselytizing religions and non-proselytizing religions? Do you know the difference between Organized religions and non-Organized religions? Do you know the difference between Abrahamic religions and Non-Abrahamic religions?

      So idiot, ignorant Subha – Proselytizing, Abrahamic, Organized Evangelizing religions are Christianity and Islam – which means, they go all around the world, invade every corner of the world, using holy wars, crusades, money, manipulation, propaganda against native religions, brainwash etc to force their rules, rules books (each has one), heaven/hell concepts to force conversions. Where as non-proselytizing religions like HInduism and Judaism are not organized (no God Head), never force their philosophies onto others. Because the basic concepts of older, wiser, non-proselytizing religions is “THERE ARE SEVERAL PATHS TO THE TRUTH, EVERY PATH IS VALID”! Extremely advanced and tolerable concept. There is a 5000 year old Hindu manuscript (forgot its name at this time) that says “MAYBE GOD CREATED HUMANS OR HUMANS CREATED GOD, WE DON’T KNOW”. Such is the nature of Sanatana Dharma – it is open-ended, exploratory – that is why yogis go off into forests exploring the meaning of life, death, our existence etc. On the other hand, proselytizing evangelizing religions – Christianity and Islam are exact opposite – there is only god, our god is the only valid god, our rule book is the only valid rule book, if you do not follow our god, our rule book, our rules, you are an infidel and going to hell…. close-ended and rigid.

      So coming to dumb invalid points, you do not have to follow or believe or do anything to understand the nuances of Sanatana dharma. And secondly, those dumb interpretations you did are the brainwash and negative propaganda created by the two proselytizing sister religions – Christianity and Islam for idiots like you to fall for them and start hating the native religions. They successfully changed intrepretations of all native relgiions of the world in order to destroy them. They did the same to American native american religions, Mayan religions, African religions, religions based on witchcraft (which was not originally bad but they brainwashed us to think they are bad).

      Finally Hinduism has several schools of thoughts. You can be an Sanatana Dharma follower and still not believe in God (that is what Buddhism is) or you can believe in some higher power without any specifics or you can believe in a certain avatar of a higher power or you can believe in million avatars of the higher power.

      One last point, you dumb moron – Adi Shakti – Show me one religion out there that survived the disgusting two proselytizing religions’ invasions that shows women as half of the Supreme God! You moron, brainwashed disgusting b*t*h! People like you should die off for this world to be a better place.

    25. Please get an appointment to doctor
      You might having hypertension man.
      Stop being so rude.

  2. @Metin, I can see and totally agree dear in a bid to live we forget life and its meaning. Its incomplete!

    1. Metin

      🙂
      maybe our life journey is to be complete.

    2. ameen summa ameen 🙂

    3. haha dumdum Subha is a Muslim masquerading as a Hindu with the name and criticizing the great non-proselytizing, non-invading, non-evangelizing Sanatana Dharma in this forum. Now I get it. This moron is a brainwashed, jihadi Muslim. How dare she come on here with “you people” and using propaganda negative material against Hindus to questions our Dharma. How dare she? b*t*h, go to your homeland, Saudi Arabia and talk shit there… they will stone you to death coming friday! How dare you, brainwashed converted b*t*h.

    4. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣SAVAGEEEE
      But plz don’t be so rude

  3. @Mystery, where r u? I enjoyed reading u. I could connect.

  4. @Jazz, you are my voice dear few year back.
    Now a days I am in a mood to find reason for everything instead of blaming.
    I believe Anu is abused as she is not strong, its her bad luck that she didn’t get that parental support.
    Despite any parental support, education, she is a rockstar on her own, and she dares to face situations and she comes out of it. So I am a die hard fan of her. And she dares do it as her father in law is standing for her. He is a gem.

  5. Finally anupama has shown baa one tannna one jawwaab….This leela budiya very chutiya

  6. Today I noticed something
    Back when Anuj first entered the show and devika was trying to tease Anu that she has an admirer then Anu was very strict with the point that she is a mother of three and MIL of 2 that’s why talks like this doesn’t suit her age.
    But today she mentioned that it isn’t because of her age but the fear of falling apart again.
    And that’s so genuine
    I see this as a personal growth
    I don’t know the reason why it happened
    But I loved how she put her fear in front of Anuj.
    Communications like this are meant for strong bonds
    I’m glad Anu has given Anuj that place in her life where she can share her greatest fear with him. Anu decided that after reunion she’ll have no contact with Anuj but now he is an important part of her life.
    I believe soon Anuj will win her heart n trust and will get a more special place in her heart.
    I love their bond

    #MaAn❤️

    1. Well said, I too liked the communication.
      When you are true to yourself, when know your priorities, when you love yourself, no one can abuse you. You can escape, defend or defeat. Yeah calamities happen and that is unfortunate.

  7. Anuj says many girls..as friend,asGF…Pyaar nhi kiya to Girlfriend banaya hi kyun?? 😂For Timepass?
    I don’t understand this thing.
    U should Date,Love then name relationship. But here totally reverse.
    U first name BF-GF, then Date then Love if mood shows up.

    Pyaar nhi hai phir bhi GF banaliya kisliye?
    Options are: a)Tharak mitaane ke liye. b)Show off ke liye. c)karne ko kuch nhi tha isliye. d)All of Above

    1. He he.. I was also confused as he is confused. Lets forget about it. It happens. Lets believe that he did time pass but couldn’t convince himself for commitment.

    2. I am not particular about Anuj.
      I asked everyones option regarding this.
      Everybody might have seen or experienced it.

    3. I am asking your opinion about this topic
      I am not asking regarding Anuj.

    4. dude please stop being orthodox. theres no such thing as true love in reality s just let it be. and life is not all about love, a person is mostly busy pursuing their goals rather than searching for love

    5. He lived in USA
      There people meet, see compatibility and even date to the ones they connect to or they like
      But love is a big word for them
      But when they use that word they make 100% sure that it’s love
      Naming infatuation or crush as love isn’t their thing

      And yes some people might say that one should save themselves till they find love
      But some explore the possibilities and let people come into there lives to see where things will go
      I mean it isn’t easy to label love
      Anything from infatuation to care can be taken as love.

      They could be right or wrong but I’m okay with anything as long as they aren’t hurting other people

    6. @Jazz, my thoughts exactly. He’s not a monk and gave himself a chance to see if he could love someone else, but didn’t.
      What Apu said is also valid, in young years falling in love etc is easier, but having been through a marriage breakup that lasted years and had her children, it is scary to let someone in and love, especially if one has fought hard for independence.

    7. Noted.
      Agreed

    8. Metin

      @amar
      Everything written is both true and false.
      some have a conception of life they have set in their minds
      some live freely
      There is no pattern to love.
      Sometimes the wind blows, you turn your head, you see eye to eye and the heart starts beating differently.
      Sometimes it doesn’t matter if you’re the only guy at a girls’ party.
      The dating you mentioned is more one-sided.
      so that the lover can make his intentions known.
      .
      @S true love exists.
      It is rejected because it happens to very few of us, because it is unplanned,because like you said some have no time for that.
      .
      @jazz
      I do not agree with you. Americans often include only their s*xual desires in the word love.
      look at their culture . they almost use the words love and f**k interchangeably.
      .
      @amar
      Take me, s, and jazz as an example.
      nobody is wrong.
      nobody is right.
      There are three different relationships with the options encountered in three different ways.
      This is roughly what I’m trying to say
      .
      @all
      most people are not honest about relationships.
      for example the jackal playing the decent guy to get the girl etc.
      This is an important issue that deflects relationship interpretations.
      .
      watch people eat.
      Some attack everything.
      some take what they love on their plate and eat it neatly.
      no offence please.

    9. I’ve seen Indians doing that too… Seeking s*x in name of love
      But I thought people in USA don’t have to disguise their desires coz they have accepted hook ups and one night stand unlike some of us

      I haven’t met a lot of americans so I didn’t have a clear idea

      No matter what country it is I feel one should do whatever they like unless they are hurting other people

    10. Noted
      My heart felt your words.

    11. Dating means givin a try to each other before framing into a relationship.
      It can be both sided love, one sided love/crush, or even no love.

      I am saying dating first cause it’s good if breakup is less. I think one should be stable and sure while getting into any kind of relationship.
      Love and relationship is not a game.

      You can Date casually, play, have fun, have night stands, etc. But name rltshp only when you are very sure about it.

      Then there will be less breakups, so less heartbreaks and it’s other consequences.

    12. Metin

      @jazz
      i agree with you at this:
      some people might say that one should save themselves till they find love
      But some explore the possibilities and let people come into there lives to see where things will go.I mean it isn’t easy to label love.Anything from infatuation to care can be taken as love.They could be right or wrong but I’m okay with anything as long as they aren’t hurting other people

    13. Thank you for writing your opinions. It’s a good experience to know other possible perspectives☺

      I am keeping my opinion without criticising anyone.
      Dating means givin a try to each other before framing into a relationship.
      It can be both sided love, one sided love/crush, or even no love.

      I am saying dating first cause it’s good if breakup is less. I think one should be stable and sure while getting into any kind of relationship.
      Love and relationship is not a game.

      You can Date casually, play, have fun, have night stands, etc. But name rltshp only when you are very sure about it.

      Then there will be less breakups, so less heartbreaks and it’s other consequences.

      Peace is most important✌

    14. Metin

      jazz used ”label”
      its a good word.
      dont need to label anything.
      in short :
      let it flows is my personal opinion.

  8. i wish i had a good luck like kavya anytime insulting and going scot free

    1. She did not go scot-free paid the ultimate price lost her job. Speaking words against others won’t get you anywhere.
      Frustrated women for sure

    2. If at all Kavya can escape it in this birth, she is going to face it in successive births.
      https://www.quora.com/Was-it-gandharis-bad-karma-that-all-of-her-100-sons-died
      Anyways my granny had told me that Gandhari had poked, spoiled 100 tortoise eggs casually, playfully.
      Both wrong doers met their fate.

  9. Will Anu leave Shah house ? if yes when ?

    1. Next Tuesday

  10. Metin

    keep up the coincidences.
    now party in the rain…
    we need many of them
    keep coming

  11. I cant wait for Anu to leave that mad house. ( Shah house)
    Will Anu marry Anuj ? I hope she does . She needs to get the happiness and love that she never got. Everyone deserves to be loved and be happy.

  12. It’s fine that Anuj didn’t lie to Anupama that he met many girls but love wasn’t there which is possible man can have fun with a womanwithout falling ln love. Please writer let Anupama fall for Anuj madly before they get married

  13. Change Anupama’s thinking let her fall in love with Anuj the kind of love she never think exit the kind of love that she did not felt before

  14. Bhai the point is what might have happened that night ? Will there be humiliation to Ravanraj once again,as i am sure anupama had done nothing wrong
    But do that old lady even have common sense she speaks like “in anyway anupama has to return today night” ,Arey the situation is so bad that they might have faced by an accident.Can’t this point get into her mind.
    If her son would have been stuck somewhere then would she expect him to come ASAP.
    Coming to Ravanraj,In past there would be Anupama’s insult when Vanraj used to sit in front of door but now the scenario has changed he is waiting for his own insult.

    Anyways waiting for the next twist.

  15. Anupama has every right to do wat she wants she is single n unattached!! Baa n Vanraj do not have any right on Anu now!! They are taking advantage of Anu coz she had been submitting to their demands b4☹ but not now anymore!!! Time for Anu to move on!!!

    1. Metin

      except ”Time for Anu to move on!!!” i agree.
      she shows him his true value.

  16. Honestly, I had thought Vanrag happiness and answer to a modernised woman was Kavya. Somehow I have my doubts. Also Toshu kind of a mother is a modern educated woman, he was ashamed to call or introduce his mother at one time and then. Please they both have what they needed, Any is practically there but like a shadow. I was expecting that all will be well with a modernised woman at home. The tables has turned, everything is going towards the liberation of Anupama. She’s not as free as she ought to and the only way is for her to leave this battered nest that already has holes in it. With Animals out of this house, Kavya will eventually divorce Mr. Shah, you know what? Mr. Shah will not let go of Anu because somehow deep down he feels a different kind of love for her, her respect, worship and stewardship to his faMily. Kavya can not give him this…. Kavya is not built to worship anyone or tramp on like Anupama. This FEAR of losing Anupama completely is hellish in the heart of Baa and her son. They want to be worshipped and played by Anu. But nothing of this sort is ever going to happen again. Anug opened up to Anu about his past relationships and to me it is a big step. These two will find love, defined it and embrace it with mutual respect for each other. God help them both achieve this.

    1. Apology for most of the typographical errors. Anu NOT ‘Animal’…. ‘Anu’ NOT ‘Any’ please. I wasn’t even wearing my glasses. My apologies please.

    2. 🤣🤣
      But u said true dear

  17. Rosemary Eguridu

    But what baffled me is varanj confess loving kavya, if so as he said why not let Anu be alone why keep bothering her? Didn’t pakhi told him not to interfere with Anupuma life.how I wish Anupama leave Shah house.

    1. Metin

      anu isnt a human on vanrajs eyes.
      she is a property who belongs to him.

  18. There is news that an actress is going to take her entry in ‘ANUPAMA’. But her character details( What role, positive or negative) is not revealed. I hope she plays any positive character & bring some positivity in Anu & Anuj’s life.

    1. I heard the new character is negative
      And I seriously hope it’s not true

    2. Yeah I too read it, new entrant is negative, enough of the drama now. The viewers had enough now no more. I hope it’s false rumour.

    3. Metin

      she might be a trigger for love.
      she goes for anuj, that makes anu advance on anuj.

  19. @Subha – your dumdum ignorant Subha – Instead of replying to your nonsense crap analysis of Hindu mythological legends in the long chain, I decided to add a comment separately! So dumdum, Subha, do you know the difference between proselytizing religions and non-proselytizing religions? Do you know the difference between Organized religions and non-Organized religions? Do you know the difference between Abrahamic religions and Non-Abrahamic religions?

    So idiot, ignorant Subha – Proselytizing, Abrahamic, Organized Evangelizing religions are Christianity and Islam – which means, they go all around the world, invade every corner of the world, using holy wars, crusades, money, manipulation, propaganda against native religions, brainwash etc to force their rules, rules books (each has one), heaven/hell concepts to force conversions. Where as non-proselytizing religions like HInduism and Judaism are not organized (no God Head), never force their philosophies onto others. Because the basic concepts of older, wiser, non-proselytizing religions is “THERE ARE SEVERAL PATHS TO THE TRUTH, EVERY PATH IS VALID”! Extremely advanced and tolerable concept. There is a 5000 year old Hindu manuscript (forgot its name at this time) that says “MAYBE GOD CREATED HUMANS OR HUMANS CREATED GOD, WE DON’T KNOW”. Such is the nature of Sanatana Dharma – it is open-ended, exploratory – that is why yogis go off into forests exploring the meaning of life, death, our existence etc. On the other hand, proselytizing evangelizing religions – Christianity and Islam are exact opposite – there is only god, our god is the only valid god, our rule book is the only valid rule book, if you do not follow our god, our rule book, our rules, you are an infidel and going to hell…. close-ended and rigid.

    So coming to dumb invalid points, you do not have to follow or believe or do anything to understand the nuances of Sanatana dharma. And secondly, those dumb interpretations you did are the brainwash and negative propaganda created by the two proselytizing sister religions – Christianity and Islam for idiots like you to fall for them and start hating the native religions. They successfully changed intrepretations of all native relgiions of the world in order to destroy them. They did the same to American native american religions, Mayan religions, African religions, religions based on witchcraft (which was not originally bad but they brainwashed us to think they are bad).

    Finally Hinduism has several schools of thoughts. You can be an Sanatana Dharma follower and still not believe in God (that is what Buddhism is) or you can believe in some higher power without any specifics or you can believe in a certain avatar of a higher power or you can believe in million avatars of the higher power.

    One last point, you dumb moron – Adi Shakti – Show me one religion out there that survived the disgusting two proselytizing religions’ invasions that shows women as half of the Supreme God! You moron, brainwashed disgusting b*t*h! People like you should die off for this world to be a better place.

    1. @Jazz, @Amar, @R Shankar, please note who resist the change here.
      We have fanatics who don’t even allow to discuss, will they allow change?
      We need another revolution to get respect/voice for women or lower caste, similar to the one which was done to eradicate Sati/child marriage!

    2. You ignore the first line and last line of @Dhana. Take the knowledge.
      Dhana isn’t opposing the need of change.

    3. Thank you @dhana. Your comment expanded my knowledge today.

  20. @Subha Be careful with this Muslim b*t*h, Subha on here. She is a Muslim, masquerading as a Hindu with that name just to criticize by starting her crap comments with “you people” haha dumdum Subha is a Muslim masquerading as a Hindu with the name and criticizing the great non-proselytizing, non-invading, non-evangelizing Sanatana Dharma in this forum. Now I get it. This moron is a brainwashed, jihadi Muslim. How dare she come on here with “you people” and using propaganda negative material against Hindus to questions our Dharma. How dare she? b*t*h, go to your homeland, Saudi Arabia, and talk shit there… they will stone you to death coming friday! How dare you, brainwashed converted b*t*h.

    1. @Stupid Dhana, you yourself proved how tolerant Sanatani you are!
      Why you brought Islam or Christianity here?
      I am talking about Hinduism, if possible defend and prove its correct!
      I am a hindu and i am doing self analysis.
      And fanatic sanatani like you are causing problems for women and lower cast in India!
      Is a burning issue and it has to be solved.

    2. @Dhana, sorry for being harsh, I just couldn’t understand why you bought Christianity/Islam here.
      I know all the good points of Hinduism and also I know the weak ones which need to be rectified.
      Nothing is perfect or constant, we need to change our society to get rid of its weak point that’s all.
      Our culture worships Adi Shakti and at the same time its known for female foeticide, nirbhaya death, dowry death etc.

  21. Betty

    Why is it that every time Anu get a little bit of happiness, those clowns end up ruining it.

    I can’t wait for her to leave the house.

  22. Metin

    @Dhana
    i dont know subha ,you or hinduism.
    subha might be right or wrong about hinduism , i dont know.
    but i know you are disgusting thinker, a person to use knowledge for abuse and insult. im sorry for you. think about me (who knows very little about hinduism), i read you , i experience a person who defends hinduism with these words.
    please examine R Shankar or VK.
    both didnt agree Subha.
    R Shankar wrote politely his/her opinion.
    VK wrote less politely/more sarcastic 🙂 his/her opinion.
    they gave us with your words :
    “THERE ARE SEVERAL PATHS TO THE TRUTH, EVERY PATH IS VALID”
    shame on you.

    in short :
    If you had written by sharing your knowledge, you would have explained something, but now if you are so smart, think about what you prove to a foreigner about someone who grew up with hinduism . sad.

    lets pretend like subha is muslim, christian or atheist.I don’t know if she said something wrong. Those who have knowledge have contributed to our ideas by sharing what they know and made warnings that they think necessary.
    so what did you provide us besides spilling the dirt inside you?

    @Jazz Bee @Amar @R Shankar @VK

  23. This platform should be to discuss Anupama serial . Now it has become a platform for slandering religions . I am sorry why Admin is not blocking all these comments .
    Guys enjoy Anupama and share comments related to the serial

    1. Chill. It’s only for today

Comments are closed.