Siya Ke Ram 28th October 2016 Written Episode Update

Siya Ke Ram 28th October 2016 Written Episode, Written Update on TellyUpdates.com

The Episode starts with Ram praying at the Ghat by stepping inside the waters. He sees Hanuman standing behind. Ram drops his ring in the waters and ends prayers. He goes to Hanuman. Hanuman asks what happened. Ram says my ring, I think it fell in waters, Sita gave that to me, it had Sita’s memories. Hanuman says don’t worry, I will find it, even if its in any Lok, you will get it, you go and rest in Rajbhavan, I will get the ring. He says Jai Shri Ram and jumps in the water.

Parvati says Swami, Hanuman is Ram’s biggest devotee, he has never got away from Ram, but what is the reason today that Ram is sending his dear Hanuman away from him. Mahadev says every incident has a motive, every work has a reason, Ram had motive to descend on earth, and now its fulfilled, his time for his Leela

to end, now Shri Hari has to return to his Dhaam along with his brothers, but Ram’s return from earth is not possible in Hanuman’s presence, Hanuman’s devotion and love is extraordinary, Hanuman will never let Ram go away, so Hanuman has to go away, it was necessary.

Kaal asks what is command for me. Mahadev says Kaal, leave for Ayodhya, your route got clear. Kaal asks about Hanuman. Mahadev says don’t worry. Kaal leaves.

Ram greets his ancestors and says I m lucky to get chance in your great Kul, I have tried to serve my Kul by true dedication, if mistakenly I did something wrong and stained Raghukul’s pride, I apologize for it, I have accepted Ayodhya’s throne for a great motive and served Praja as a king, I have regarded Praja as children, and gave importance to Kul’s Maryada and customs over my personal life, I have a request, free me of my duties now, I have handed over the duty to your Vansh with all the customs.

Lav and Kush come. Lav and Kush ask what are you saying, did we do any mistake that you want to go. Ram says no, its nature, dry leaves fall and get into soil, then new leaves are formed on the tree, what was yesterday is not today and what is today will not be tomorrow, the universe has run like this and will always run same way, I have nothing left to give like an old tree, but you both have to bring essence in this world by your good deeds, you have to lay new good customs, and do what I could not do, this is your duty.

Lav says you are out ideal, we want to follow you. Ram says no, its right to take inspiration from someone, its wrong to depend on someone, everyone has independent thoughts, every person sees world by his own sight by his sense and experience, you don’t need to become like me, you have to see world by your own sight, time always changes, and its necessities also change, I want you both to take decision yourself and get firm on it. Kush says if we decide anything wrong. Ram says always listen to your conscience/inner soul, such decisions are not wrong, don’t do anything for your ownself, if any mistake happens, then be ready to repent for it. They nod. Ram leaves.

Hanuman tries to find the ring in water and other lok too. He gets inside the dark place inside the water bed and thinks what is this light in this darkness, maybe there is way to go out. He kicks the mountain and sees some gold. He looks on. Laxman is shown fallen on the ground and Kaal takes his soul. Urmila wakes up by this bad dream and says Swami, what bad thing did I see, I won’t let this happen. Laxman comes. Urmila asks are you fine. She says I have seen a bad dream, a big abshagun. He smiles and says abshagun has become part of our life, whats there to worry. She asks what are you saying. He says come sit, what did you see.

She says you are not taking my words seriously, I have seen your life is in danger and you fell dead on the ground. He says so dream was of my death, whats there to worry, our death gets definite at the time of our birth, the journey from birth to death is called life, don’t worry, its time for me to change clothes. He goes. She says his words do not feel simple, does this have any relation with my bad dream. Hanuman sees so many rings, and says all rings are like Ram’s ring, I have to find Ram’s real ring from all of this. He goes to touch and can’t hold it. He says what is this Maya, this can never happen that Ram’s devotee Hanuman can’t do Ram’s work, its Ram’s command that I find ring, and I will surely fulfil his command.

He thinks does Ram want to explain me something by this ring, but what is there in this ring. Kaal says Hanuman forgot its impossible to stop Kaal, whenever a human’s life journey gets completed, I have to come. Ram sits praying. Kaal says maybe you don’t know, but many people’s life journey got over in Ayodhya. He taeks disguise of a Rishi. Ram opens his eyes.

Precap:
Rishi/Kaal tells Ram that I want to talk to you in private. Laxman comes. Kaal says till we are in this Kaksh, no one should come in this Kaksh, else I will give him death punishment. Kaal comes to his real form and says all Devtas have a wish that you leave this human body and come back to your real Dhaam, but your brothers have to leave from the world before you. Ram gets upset.

Update Credit to: Amena

78 comments

  1. Malvi

    Omg! Maybe Lakshman knows abt that already! Happie diwali to u n to ur family guys ! 😃😃😃Be happy! And don’t burst China crackers! 🙂

  2. Shivani

    |Registered Member

    superb episode .I am missing mata sita.I have never heard about kaal coming to take ram along with him .I think laxman was cursed,anyways episode is nice.
    @samarth :ram knew about his divinity but could not take help of it because human beings have limitations.lord vishnu took birth as human being just to teach a lesson that human beings are fallible.they are just puppet of fate .ram wants to show that even he can commit a mistake.he showed by his decision.human beings are vulnerable to mistakes.his decision is just a way to convey his message.

    • Supreetha (Soups)

      Kaal did come. He spoke to Ram that his end was near and requested him to give up his life. Before that, Lakshman is ordered by Ram to guard the room where the latter and Kaal were about to converse with a promise not to allow anyone inside and if anyone does, he would be awarded death. During the course of the conversation, sage Durvasa comes and expresses his wish to meet Ram when Lakshman informs him of the order that Ram gave, after receiving and honouring the sage. The sage warns Lakshman and tells him to inform Ram else he would curse and wipe out the whole kingdom. That’s when Lakshman decides that it would be better to end his life than bring a cuss upon Ayodhya. And he interrupts the conversation between Ram and Kaal. As per the promise, Ram had to kill Lakshman but he couldn’t. So upon consultation with Maharishi Vasisht, Ram gives up all his relations with Lakshman, which according to the Vedas was equal to death punishment. Lakshman accepts the order and gives up his body, ascends to Vaikunth and waits for Ram as Adi Shesh.

  3. niharikamalhotra

    Hi alllllll…
    #happydhanterash…
    #happydiwali…
    Wow,kaal dev on his way….
    Hope to see u again..
    Byeee

  4. SKR fan

    धनतेरस की हार्दिक शुभकामनाएँ।
    Feeling sad for Hanuman. He has to part from his Prabhu Shri Ram. Lakshmila scene was emotional. And father and sons scene too. Don’t forget to watch 300th episode of Siya ke Ram on Monday.

  5. Padmaja

    |Registered Member

    Lakshmila scene was emotional… feeling sad for hanuman.. missing siya very much… wanna see her once….

    And a very happy diwali to all.. May this Diwali bring prosperity and happiness into ur lyf..
    Pls take care of urself when bursting crackers….

  6. joy

    How was today episode????
    Don’t miss any……
    Just 5 EPISODE REMAINING……………
    MONDAY IS 300 EPISODE OF SKR…………….

  7. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    WHO IS A PERFECT HUSBAND?

    ( Its just the rework of my previous article with few additions )

    Most people think why was sita’s second vanvas necessary. Most people interpret it as Ram did it because of Rajya dharma. But its high time to think upon various reasons behind sita’s second exile and what will happen in other ways. Was it only about Raj dharm.

    First of all let us imagine what will happen to Ram sita and their kids if sitas second exile is not done.

    First in the case of Ram all the so called women, feminists and critics will portray Ram as an ideal husband who supported his wife kept his wife with him. He will be happy without any question mark on his character. His side would be perfect. But what about sita and children? Can they be happy in such a situation?

    Most people criticize Ram for sending his wife to valmiki ashram and that too during pregnancy.

    It was the best environment for her and her children. Moreover in uttarkhand sita herself puts forward her wish to live in the peaceful environment of ashram rather than the environment of palace. If sita was present in ayodhya she had to bear mental tortures and rumours during her delivery phase. It will affect both her as well as her children psychologically. And if the children were kept in ayodhya then the children have to bear and listen to the rumours said by ayodhya vasis. This will affect the mental state of children and also their studies and lives. How can their future be shaped if in small age itself they grew up hearing rumour in such a state.

    If sita vanvas was not done then one and only one Ram would be happy and praised for supporting his wife and children. But both sita and children even though living in palace appears to be happy but will never get peace of mind and even the palace would be hell for them. Yes Ram’s presence will be there but both Ram and sita are united spirituality and psychologically that physical absence will not affect their love.

    Now talking about valmiki ashram. It is the most serene environment. A place blessed with medicinal herbs, ayurveda, many women saints who are experts in treatment and caring than dasis of ayodhya palace and also all facilities to support and care for pregnant woman. Sita’s condition in valmiki ramayan was perfect with the support of all these understanding people. She was far away from rumours and people who torture others with harsh words. She had both physical facilities and also mental sanity which Ram lacked in ayodhya’s palace.

    Moreover even todays many literary critics to portray Sita’s condition was pathetic as she was not in palace in the presence of her husband. This that what etc etc. But the truth is if was kept in palace at that time then her condition would be pathetic. Husband’s physical presence is not the only thing a woman wants during pregnancy. She needs mental peace, psychological peace, serene environment, facilities and people to understand and respect her. Living in palace surrounded by people who are spreading rumours will definitely disturb sita who is known for her self esteem.

    And talking about husband’s support and presence during her pregnancy, I would like to give an example from present day. Few months before, I remember a day when I accompanied my mother to the hospital because she needs to see the doctor. In the hospital it was the day of delivery for a women. Her husband is with her, to pay bill, to bring medicine, to stand besides her etc. Soon the woman started to cry in pain. Suddenly a young beautiful nurse came to her. Soon the attention of the husband changed from his wife who was crying in severe pain to that beautiful gorgeous nurse. Suddenly the girl’s parents came. The girls mother said look at my son in law he is the perfect husband he was with his wife during her most toughest situation. He supported her. He came here leaving his job. My daughter is really lucky. The girl was taken to operation theatre. But the man is still busy in noticing where is the nurse, her face, the length of her dress etc etc when his wife was battling with life and death in labour pain.

    Me and my mother were waiting for our doctor who has to come after this delivery. We observed all these. I told to mom. Look my mother how a person who don’t even had tension for his wife is portrayed as a best husband just because he was present near her. Where as my Ram ji who in each and every second thought, cared and was always in tension for sita and her happiness even though he was not physically near her is portrayed as a bad husband. Usually and frankly speaking physical absence can affect any relationship. But Ram never allowed sita’s absence to affect his love for her.

    It is high time to change the perception that a person who is physically present with his wife is a best husband and a person who is far away from his wife is a bad husband. Ram supported sita emotionally spiritually and psychologically and a real women like sita only care for such things than physical presence. We only see sita sad when she knows about separation from Ram other than that we will never see sita crying and yearning for Ram’s physical presence.

    Most people say and most tv serials depict as if ram threw his pregnant wife to the dense forest in front of wild animals. But in almost all ramayan it is clearly said that lord ram asks lakshman to leave sita near valmiki ashram. Most people even call it exile. Exile means sending a person out of a kings territory but valmiki ashram is under the territory of ram under his maintenance and protection so why to call it exile.

    Now talking about luv kush. They got a beautiful environment to nurture. A great guru like valmiki and other saints to educate them in various fields and many people to understand and support them. They had peace of mind.

    In such a case the person who suffered the most is Ram only. Accused for sending his pregnant wife to valmiki ashram. For not keeping them in palace. Not able to be near them. Ram is criticized as a bad husband who took a wrong decision.

    Now talking about why ram didn’t beat or kill the washer man just like most of our so called heroes and superheroes do in films.

    Rather Ram ji lived the life of vairagya without any pleasures. Made a golden sita each day after sita’s separation and showed this world that look ayodhya vasis, the woman whom you people accused for chastity is the woman whom I worship as a Goddess. You can separate us physically but we are two bodies with one soul even though separated, always present together. I think it’s of great impact to show ayodhya wasis that they can remove sita from ayodhya’s throne but not from the throne in Ram’s heart.

    This had more impact than all other things. If ram would have reacted to the washer man beaten him or killed him then it also means that he is affected by his remarks about his wife. Rather Ram never reacted to it because as a husband he is never affected by such things. But as a king he has to do the duty of a king and even at that time also he ensured to make facilities for his wife and children.

    Common man even without having severe life problems like Ram fail to be a good husband. But Ram despite of all these problems proved to be a good husband who supported his wife and a good father who ensured good environment for the growth of his children even at difficult situation.

    Dear men, before questioning Ram. Make sure.

    1. R u sincerely committed to ur wife.

    2. Did u never look at any other woman other than ur wife.

    3. Did u raise ur voice against ur wife at least once.

    4. Did u always treat her as ur equal.

    5. Did u always allow her to make decisions of her life.

    6. Did u respect ur wife’s family and its members like ur own family without at least 0.001% of distinction.

    7. How many woman’s proposals and approaches you denied for ur wife.

    8. Did u suffer for ur wife.

    9. Did u fight for her self esteem.

    10. Did u try to fulfil each and every wishes of her.

    11. Will u run behind a deer if ur wife says or just react by saying am I fool to run behind a deer for u

    12. How many of u will talk for ur wife in front of ur mother.

    13. In a difficult situation will u try to make urself safe or will prefer to make ur kids and wife safe and bear the pain and public shame.

    14. Will u prove ur chastity for ur wife more than 10 repeated times just like Ram had to do.

    15. Did u discuss most important things of ur life with ur wife.

    16. Will u cry for her in her sorrows.

    17. Whose wish will be more important to u. Ur wish or ur wife’s wish.

    Please don’t ask how can a man do all these things for his wife. Because all these are things which Ram did for his wife without any complaints. I can ever write a book on other things. So the point is before questioning Ram make yourself sure that u can do at least 5% of things which Ram did for sita.

    Dear women, before questioning Ram make sure ur husband ur brother ur father ur son or any other men is even 5% of what Ram is and will do all the above mentioned things for his wife.

    Sorry to say but if a husband is like Ram then there is no need for him to be present with his wife always the thought of just being the wife of such a husband itself would bring immense happiness and pride to the mind. And if a person has a husband who makes fun of women never treat wife as his equal never cried for her in her pains then what is the use of such a husband to be always present near the wife.

    The incident used to portray Ram as a wrong husband the same incident itself is enough to show Ram is perfect husband.

    If any other man was in Ram’s situation then

    1. He would have killed almost half of his subjects for questioning him.

    2. Must have committed suicide.

    3. Must have ran away to somewhere without informing others.

    4. Would have left the kingdom king less as none of his brothers accepted it. A kingdom without a king is the stage for various evil things like rape in kingdom injustice tortures etc.

    5. Must have kept his wife in palace. Let her hear rumour why should I care. I want to be called perfect husband so let her suffer inner turmoil in palace.

    6. Let anything happen in my kingdom I don’t care. My personal life is more important for me.

    Ram suffered problems which were as big as himalaya and handled it beautifully to my shock most people who question Ram are people who don’t even handle problems similar to at least a stone without any mistakes. It is somewhat similar to a boy who is 4 th standard failure questioning an IAS officer why u took time to prepare for upsc exam.

  8. Rani

    Wonderful episode but scary too -Laxman’s death is nearing . Laxman will be asked to ensure nobody enters the room when the meeting between Lord Ram & Yamraj takes place and if someone enters he has to embrace death . In the meantime -Rishi Durbhasha will come and will like to meet Ram, if not allowed Rishi warns that Ram & Ayodha will be cursed so Laxman takes the death penalty and allows Durbhasa in between the meeting. That’s the original version.
    Ram and all 3 brothers were born because of Putra yagna and bowl of Kheer came out of the yagna and it was divided among the 3 queens . So all the brothers have share the power of the lord /avatar purush- Ram gets the major share but other also has the power. nd their death also is together .
    @ Samarth -that is another reason why 7th Avatar Ram was not PURNA AVATAR .
    At the end -HAPPY DIWALI to all of you . May light of engulf our lives and darkness goes off . please don’t burst crackers rather throw away ego & anger .

  9. spm

    Yes felt sad for Urmila but death is the ultimate truth . Time for Laxman to go. Waiting for Monday’sepisode.
    @ samarth -you are a male and that’s why you shall never be able to see from a female point of view.
    Lord Ram was a kind king , a wonderful son & father figure to his brothers but Lord Ram did not fulfill his duties of a husband & father -GOOD and bad is out of question. The person who paritayag his wife , abandon his wife and desert his wife in the middle of night is NOT A HUSBAND . A person who knows that his wife is chaste but abandons his wife because of Dhobi’s remark is NO HUSBAND at all.
    A person after getting to know his sons identity and demands second agnipariksha – fails to become a husband .
    A person who instead of supporting a chaste wife – gives her lifelong pain and stigma of impurity is NOT AT ALL A HUSBAND .
    Ram did not provide for his sons and his wife – he asked laxman to leave her in a deserted van ,Laxman atleast dropped her nearby to Sage Valmiki’s ashram And it was Laxman who saved Sita for commiting suicide – otherwise Sita wanted to suicide after such allegations
    Ram never sent Hanuman for caring Sita even if he has done as per you Samarth – Husband & sevak is different , Hanumanji can;t take the place of a Husband
    A king should be balanced – He should look after his country men but not at the cost of doing injustice to an innocent & chaste wife . Because wife is also a part of Praja -WOMAN of the society /samaj and Rajdharma should encompass all .
    King should make sure that all men and women gets equal right . , woman are respected .
    If Ram was sensible husband HE would have at least consulted QUEEN SITA . King has all right and queen SIta – no right, no right to know about her punishment , no right to defend the verdict ?? No right to prove herself ??
    Sita was not even told about the abandonment as Ram knew at his heart he had done wrong .
    Ram could not face Sita before Sita left for 2nd exile as Ram had no courage to face innocent & chaste wife.
    @ Samarth Please write a book but before that Answer all the questions that has been asked BY MATA SITA in SKR – Hats off to SKR for showing that bold side of MATA SITA
    I too can write why Ram was not a husabnd , failed as a husband , failed to become a leader to change the rules of the society against woman . What Ram did any ordinary man turned husband could do to his wife – ABANDONMENT . Easy way out .
    @ Samarth what Ram suffered residing in a palace with all his family members – mothers , brothers . is NOTHING compared to What Sita had to undergo all alone in an Ashram. Sita’s pain& Suffering is as big as Surya dev/Son, SIta ‘s patience as Mother Earth , Sita heart is so big that whole universe can merge in it.
    @ samarth – if sita wanted , she could have cursed Ram & Ayodha – She is Ma Vasundhara – Ayodha would vanished from the World , flood or famine could have engulfed Ayodha but she did not
    If Sita wanted she could have taught negative words to luv & Kush about their father – but she did not rather She ordered her sons to accept their father Ram before going to Mother Earth
    because Luv & kush was very angry with Ram , for what Ram did to their mother.
    It was Sita who made sure her sons got the respect of the society and name of the father – SHE GAVE UP HER LIFE > SHE WENT TO MOTHER EARTH-RAM DID NOTHING NOTHING AT ALL .It was only Sita who did everything . Sita was a perfect wife whereas Ram was no husband at all in this incarnation
    ANyway , Diwali ki hardik shub kamnaye sab ko .

  10. Sara

    very touchy – loved today’s episode . Sad to note that laxman has to give up his life.
    @Samarth- You mentioned about Ram Rahasaya Upanishad – No one knows who wrote that but is is written in Modern Ear that is in 17 th century in the glory of Lord Ram and in it Hanuman says those words what you mentioned yesterday about RAm. Yes Hanuman could see the divinity in Lord Ram – I fully agree because Hanuman is the greatest devotee of Ram but Ram being not an purna avatar did not know about his divinity,
    Secondly Ram Rashaya Upahishad is NOT AT ALL THE PART OF ORIGINAL and MUKHYA UPANISHAD . All Mukhya UPNASHishad was written even before Gautam Budhha -Ist millienum BCE .LONG LONG AGO written by Yajnavalkavya , Uddalaka before Lord Krishna , Lord Rama -that was Satya YUGA – Uppanishadic yga .
    Original Upanishad was divided into _RIG VEDA , Soma Veda , Yajurveda , Atharveda
    @ Samarth you need to read the Adi Shaka archarya ‘s version of Vedas/upanishads or join school Vedanta or – you don’t want to understand fine- May Lord Krishna grant you the vision to see the truth .
    HAPPY DIWALI TO ALL – Thanks friends and all.

  11. Devga

    |Registered Member

    @Nabanita can’t forget u and al my skr frnds …. but due to tym issue I was not able to watch skr for past few months … and I dint comment bcz of tht only … don’t think I lost interest in skr …

    Today’s episode omg … wantedly ram seperated hanuman from him … 🙁 🙁 🙁
    Very emotional talk wit luv Kush ….
    Overall emotional episode ….
    Omg I don’t have courage to watch tomo episode aftr watching the precap…. 🙁

    Anyways skr frnds this is for u alll….

    http://first-wishes.com/diwali/?n=Devga-aka-Devu/

  12. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    You know the reason why she didn’t curse ayodhya @spm then listen because Maa Sita really know the reason of sending her to Rishi valmiki ashram…and @spm being a fan of skr is good but in reality skr has done nothing but a degrade in Ramayana….many of you may say that it has shown from matasi sita’s perspective but in reality they failed to show that perspective and instead end up bringing down all the characters….for the best ramayana till now you should refer to Ramanand sagar ramayana because there no injustice is done with any of the character and yes @sara no doubt upnishad is written in 17th century but that holds its importance till now because mantras and other details are alright and nodoubt that is said by Shri Hanuman but the thing is he won’t promote lie….@rani that kheer has nothing to do with avatars as the kheer was equally divided in 3 parts and later maa kaushlya and maa sumit ra gives equal share to maa kakeyi…so that has nothing to do with powers……and yes one more thing for knowing the glory of shri Rama you may refer to padua puran a and one more thing that as per scriptures kalas have to do with yugas and to be called as purna avatar there is need of 6 gunas… which were present on both Sri krishna and Rama….and yes one last thing that when you read ramayana use both your mind and heart and if you had any sort of doubt then you should go to the supreme shri Ram and ask about the reason but don’t spread wrong information like that….@spm you are really thinking from point of view of just feminism….try to grasp the real meaning…hope shri Rama and maa sita give you such insight that you end up clearing all your doubts….Jai Siya Ram

    • Rahul Mishra

      I am totally agreed with you Samarth. I have also read in Valmiki Ramayan that Ram instructed Laxaman to leave Sita near Valmiki Ashram (why Valimiki Ashram it is also explained by Laxman to Sita in original version). Yes for Sita it was really shocking but no one more than her understand Ram completely. Lord incarnation is never with plus and minus. Every incarnation has its own purpose and way to pursue it. In Ram avatar, Lord put himself in control of Yogmaya (Lord’s divine illusory power) and in Krishna avatar He himself controlled Yogamaya. It is like Yogmaya was director of entire Ramayan (Script written by lord Shiv, narrated to Goddess Parvati) and Ram just an actor therefore we see forgetfulness in Lord Ram incarnation and he acts perfectly like a human. Ravan was having a boon to be killed only by human. Adhyatam Ramayam says Sita is yogmaya (and Sri also). Therefore you see all miracle only with Sita (indeed she is Maya herself) but no miracles with Ram because he has already put himself under direction of Maya.

  13. Rani

    I too liked the episode . Yesterday’s precap was confusing but after seeing SKR -I liked it very much.But Laxman is going ………..
    @ Sara- you are right about Upanishad .All UPANISHADs has been received in Sruti form and then composed long back in VEdic YUGA whereas Samarth bhaiya mentiond about RRU -is written in 17th ERA -Kali yuga/ Modern era.
    Original Upanishads were written in vedic Sanskrit whereas RRU is not -Secondly giving a Name of Upanishad does not make something Upanishad.
    It is like comparing Devdutta Patnaaik Ramayan and ORIGINIAL Ramayan likeSage Valmiki’s Ramayan . Devdutta is interpolated version & written in Modern era .
    @Samarth -now I understand why you are misguided . You Should get admitted in Vedanta School as your doubts need to be clear
    WHatever you Said about RRU – it is like reading Devdutta ‘s Ramayan and claiming to know all about Ramayan.
    Secondly as Sara mentioned -unknown person wrote RRU from the Hanuman’s point of view in the glory of RAMA and that too in 17th CENTURY. OK ???
    Lord Ram had no idea of divinity and he descended from maya region whereas same Ram came as Lord Krishna from Maha Maya region and next Avatar form will be more powerful .The 10th Avatar Kalki will be the most powerful of all. Will come at the time of mahapralaya -final dissolution .
    @ Samarth -So please read things which are ORIGINALS or atleast read stuff of Sages and Saints of ISkon, Swami Narayan group or Ramakrishna Mission or Sri Ram chandra MIssion etc

  14. Sara

    Happy Diwali to all of you once again. Really waiting for MONDAY”S episode -only one more week.
    @ Rani=thanks . I full agree with you
    @ Samarth -have you heard of Adi Shakara ??????? He was a GREAT INDIAN Philosopher, his birth is around 4-8th Century and wrote comment & authenticate the MUkhaya Upanishad
    Shankara Vendata and Mahayana Buddinism both have detailed research on Upanishad to clear your doubts .
    @ Samarth as I have already mentioned your RRU is written in 17 th century -MODERN ERA so Shankara Vendata or Mahayana Buddinism -does not have include that RRU OK??? proves that this RRU is not genuine .
    As pointed out by Rani-giving the name of Upanishad does not make something upanishad . Like Giving a name sulochana does not make any one bad person to have good sight .
    @samarth -please get admitted in Vedanta school.

  15. Veena

    Happy diwali to you all . May the light of your self enlighten yourself.
    even waiting for monday’s epsiode . Upset too to note that Laxman shall die.But he said correctly – the person who takes birth has to die. sad for Urmila.
    And Yes, I agree with SPM- after paritayag of SITA the question of good or bad husband is not all valid. It is like divorce . Sita ‘s all right were snatched away with that verdict of abandonment but She did not give up. She raised her sons nicely -Ram as a father has no role in that .
    As shown in SKR-& told by SITA – as Ram did not fulfill his promises during sat phere /marriage – sita is no longer his wife . I fully agree with SKR.
    @ Sara you are right . Original Upanishad are from Vedic yuga .It is verified by Adi Shakara chariya . It is from SATYA yuga -written in vedic sanskrit.
    Whereas RRU is written in 17th century by some unknown figure in the glory of Ram. It is like Ramayan by Devdutta Patnaik .Whereas Sage Valmiki’s Ramayan is original.
    @ samarth -So reading Devdutta Patnaik’s gives imaginative idea just like reading RRU. Please read original and authentic stuff
    Read Adi SHankara ‘s books or books of Ramakrishna’s Mission etc

  16. Rani

    HAPPY DIWALI_ enjoy diwali- NO CRACKERS _ NO pollution
    Only one more week for SKR —SO VERY HAPPY DIWALI TO YOUE ENTIRE TEAM.
    @ Sara – you are right . Upanishads existed from Vedic yug /Satya YUg .
    Adi shakara charya validated those upanishads.
    Even Mahayana Buddinism does so .
    @Samarh you are simply misguided by reading Ram Rashsaya Upanishad ( RRU) as unknown person wrote that in 17th century -MODERN YUGA /ERA
    Like Devdutta Patnaiyk- wrote Ramayan . But it can’t be compared with Original Version of Sage Valmiki’s RAMAYAN . VAlmiki was alive when Ramayan happened . MANY SAINTS & Sage , scholars have written Ramayan following Valmiki’s work
    Whereas Devdutta is a modern writer -it is totally unreal , imaginative Same like your RRU – giving a tag of Upanishad does not make anything close to Upanishad.

  17. joy

    HAPPY DIWALI ALL OF MY SKR FANS……………… WISHING HAPPINESS IN YOUR LIFE………………………….

  18. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    http://www.hinduwebsite.com/upalist.asp this is the link of all the upnishads and all of them are sacred and just to prove your point true you cannot deny the upnishads here is one more upnishad named as RAM Tapniya upnishad and that’s from time of 11th century….anyways if you are not gonna understand this we can’t do anything….and there are many scriptures too depiciting shri Ram as parameters braham….hope you get this…I can’t argue anymore with people who don’t are not gonna believe even after proof of scriptures….because vedas,puran,upnishad,geeta and Ramayana can not be false….

  19. Sara

    HAPPY Diwali to all SKR team , fans and all
    @Samarth- SKR in fact uphold The image of RAM not degraded . Skr has created a very nice image of SRI RAM
    SKR did not show the heartless image of Ram-Ram asking for 2nd TIME aganipariksha from SIta after luv& Kush was identity was known.That’s why She said-enough and she went to mother Earth forever and making RAM & all Ayodha silent ,proving her chastity , giving her son the social status .
    Sita did not curse AYodha as she had unconditional love for Ram even though Ram abandoned her .DID not keep ihis promises made during the marriage . It is SIta’s greatness , nothing to do about Ram.
    In fact, during WAR SRIRam was shown like hero in SKR – SKR did not show the real Yudha Kand as per Valmiki’s Ramayan- They showed Lanka Kand -that is actually degraded the image of Hanumanji, Laxman , Sugreev , Anagnd , Vibhishan & all – BUT uphold the image of Ram as HERO . Hanumanji was AJAY – Sage Valmiki later wrote about Hanumanji but Hanumanji threw that in ocean as it was demeaning the image of his lord Ram and making Hanumanji – GREAT -We all know the RUDRA AVATAR of LORD SHIVA is Hanumanji.
    @ Samarth – I said Ram Rahasaya was written in 17 th century-modern era but NOT BY HANUMANji himself – the person who wrote was writing from the point of HANUMANJI -that unknown author imagined how Hanumanji might have thought of his lord RAM. Hanumanji himself did not write anything rather threw away in the ocean the Mahakavya written in his GLORY by SAGE VALMIKI. It is Hanumanji’s greatness
    RUDRA AVAtar of Lord Shiva-Hanumanji was ajay and more powerful than RAM -shakat mochan as popularly known. Ram could not have won the war or could not have done many things if HANUMANJI was not beside Lord RAM and again it proves Ram was not purna avatar.

    Secondly , MANY SAINTS & SAGES have said that RAM WAS NOT PURNA avatar – it is a well known fact among HINDUS that Sri Ram had no clue what he was .LORD KRISHNA ‘s sudrashan chakra is the most powerful till date . but Ram had nothing of that sort rather he needed the help of Hanumanji many times to get victory, Ram needed the help of Vibhishan to fight with Ravaan, Ram needed the help & support of his brother laxman in every step of his life be it war or daily life
    And yes, next Avatar – Lord Ram turned into Lord Krishna turned into next will have more power than the previous avatar -that’s law of Nature. Lord Ram & Lord Krishna are both same but Lord Ram was not purna avatar as it was the need of time & nature and but when Ram came as Lord Krishna – Krishna was purna avatar as it was the need of time & nature .
    @samarth -this simple is why beyond your uderstanding I don’t know.
    And yes, kheer was equally divided among 3 queens/mothers -so power of the lord got didvided -4 brothers equally become ONE WHOLE – Ram being the eldest gets the major share .That’s again prove why Ram was incomplete -NOT PURNA AVATAR.
    @samarth-I don’t understand why don’t you understand this simple truth

    @Samarth -like Ram Rahsaya ,-padma Puran is written in around 15 century . Mostly from bengali and west India – It is after Adi shakara chariya who reinvented Hinduism -the oldest Religion-sanatana dharma – because Hinduism lost its everything because of Buddhism. But Adi shakara chariya reinvented it . PLEASE DO YOUR own research ,
    Now Padma Purana says about Ram& sita -story is different from the original writer SAGE VALMIKI. VAlmiki is the only one who lived during RAM’s period so that is only the CORRECT version and Padma Purana is not genuine.
    @samarth -why don’t you understand simple logic ? It means you are extremist who only want to listen about Ram -whatever is written about Ram. GOOD but read the correct version , authentic version not the biased version -there is 2 groups Ram group and Krishna group-.Ram ‘s group says Ram is great ,krishna group says Krishna is great but I say both are same but Ram is not purna avatar & he came from Maya region whereas Krishna from Mahamaya so purna avatar .
    Moreover please avoid 15th-17th century imaginative stuff written by people from their imagination That can’t be true bhaiya .

    I don’t depend on Television serial like Ramanad , ndtv ( not watched ) to understand Ramayan or Mahabharat . Ramayan and Mahabharat should be read and understood from HEART and not mind . Unless regulated mind is restless and shows us what we want . BUT HEart tells the truth- because it is the seat of the Ultimate -NARAYAN.
    At the end, SKR has shown goody goody Ram, shown his pain -you all liked but the moment Mata Sita argued with Ram about his decision before going to Mother Earth- you did not like SKR ?? Very unfair.
    All questions asked by SKR SITA is 101% valid & we should contemplate about it .All men should resolve that they should do injustice to woman and all woman should be independent like Sita
    At last SALUTE To SKR for showing those questions of SITA-WONDERFUL

  20. Sara

    I mean all men should NOT do injustice towards woman and respect woman .Then Mata sita would be very happy from her abode. Her sacrifice will be meaningful .

    • Shivani Singh

      U r saying rgt Sara about justice and respect to woman
      As per Ramayana original one
      Rishi durvasa will come to meet Shri Ram but laxman Ji will stop rishi durvavsa
      Point to be noted that Rishi durvasa get angry on almost everything and gives curse , every given by him has special purpose
      He will threaten laxman Ji of cursing ayodhya , if laxman does not let him meet Ram Ji ayodhya will be like barren land
      Then despite of other rishi/kaal warning laxman Ji will enter to tell Ram Ji about rishi durvasa
      He will see kaal in his true form then ram Ji will get upset because of promise to kaal about death punishment to person entering into that kaksh
      Then he will consult his every minister
      Nobody gives suggestion as everything loves laxman Ji
      Then hanuman Ji will suggests that according to shastra kisi ka tyag krna bhi usko mrityu dand dene k barabar hota h
      This punishment will be given by Shri Ram to laxman Ji because he cannot give him death penalty literally
      This how Laxman Ji will die

    • Preethi12345

      |Registered Member

      hey priya di happy diwali to u too and happy diwali to all of my sisters. have fun .
      i will see u alll on the last episode of skr.till then bye sisters

  21. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    Truly speaking I didn’t believe everything which is shown in Ramayana even after that…but the thing here is that Ram was purna avatar and you can’t doubt the purans and upnishads if you do that’s your wish but that doesn’t make that reality false and yes she was doing informed about her vanvaas you may check from ramayana rest is your wish……..and yes these gunas are main reason to be called as purna avatars not kalas…..as said earlier..which proof did you had that 16 kalas are essential to be called as purna avatar..atleast I had puran which you didn’t accept and the proof of lord Rama as supreme are given in one more upnishad Rama Tapniya upnishad dated around 11th century….rest Is your wish..because baste hai vishwas meither Ram

  22. Supreetha (Soups )

    Hats off to Siya Ke Ram for showing many aspects for us to learn from alla the characters
    Special mention to you guys, Sara, Veena, Rani, Samarth Bhaiyya and all others who have written so much both for and against decisions of Ram and Sita’s behaviour…..you guys are awesome! Thanks for the information. Appreciate and Respect all the knowledge you have! 🙏🙏Please keep sharing more…. all the others benefit 🙂 I don’t know if I’ve read enough or learnt enough to comment on all the sensitive issues raised here. Do share your sourcesearch of reading! You guys are just awesome! Thanks

  23. Rani

    @ Shivani agreed .
    The two persons who went to Vanvas with Ram that is SIta & laxman – both gave up their lives for Ram.
    Rishi Durbhasha was famous for cursing .How beautifully Lord Krishna would save Draupadi & pandavas from Durvasha’s curse during Pandavas exile -Lord Krishna ate one rice grain and Rishi Durbhasha & his group was full stomach. Draupadi prayed to Lord and lord came to help
    @Samarth- see this is why Lord Krishna is purna avatar.
    We don’t need Upanishads and Puranas to prove that Lord Krishna was purna avatar-ramayan & mahabharat itself proves Lord Ram was not purna whereas in his next birth He himself was purna /poorna/full
    And yes, Upanishads were received and composed during Vedic yuga that is Satya yuga -validated by great ADI shankara chariya & Even by Buddhists .
    @ Samarth Kindly adhere to real upanishads & Puranas -OK? Not the ones written in 15 century – 17 century . Just adding the name of Upanishad and puranas does not make anything Upanishad & Puranas.

    I agree with Sara – SKR has very good image of RAM and hats off to SKR for showing SITA ‘s questions- those are genuine questions -must be understood by society.

    @Samarth -Sara pointed correctly that you read only books which is written in the glory of sriRam It does not matter to you whether it is imaginative or unreal
    @ Samarth -have you read Bhagwad Purana ? It is one among 18 puranas – even Buddhist believe it .
    @Samarth -have you heard of Astavakra Gita ?????.It is advaita Vedanta -It is a dialogue between raj Rishi Janak and His Guru Astavakra .What Ram could not do in his lifetime a he had no knowledge of what he was -non poorna , HIs father in law could do because he was Rishi + RAJA .
    @Samarth – your Ram Tapniya was also in 11century -or 16 century not validated by Buddhist or Adi Sankara -these RAm Rahasya , Ram Tapniya are all later versions and tag of upanishad was added behind them by extremist who wanted to show Ram to be the Great.
    Yes Ram is great but if he is WITH SITA ( ABsolute POwer) and Laxman ( conscience) and Hanumanji -as Rudra avatar of LORD SHIVA -then he becomes complete. DUe to the division kheer patra – powers were divided among 4 brothers.
    @ Samarth Ramanad Sagar showed Tulsidas Ramayan -As per Original version -sita had to give 1st Agni pariksha but SkR saved RAm’s image and showed sita gave 1st agnipariksha . SKR is close to original in that matter
    Whereas Ramanad sagar showed tulsidas Ramayan -it shows chaya sita .
    NOW Tulsidas being devotee could not accept that his lord Ram asking for agnipariksha from Mata SIta . So Tulsidas made up this story of CHaya sita which is FALSE as per Sage Valmiki’s Ramayan

    @ Samarth – I like SKR more than Ramanad sagar’s ramayan . Actors are good in SKR

  24. varshini

    hi guys , i am varshini using a different e mail id . wish u all a happy diwali . may this diwali bring happiness and peace in ur lives

  25. joy

    @Aman……….
    I think after end the DVD will available………. I think after one month of end you should any DVD shop…………

  26. Sara

    Hi supreetha- Thanks a lot .B
    @ samarth – You have mentioned about the Ram Rashya , & others all of Modern era -15-16-17 centuries . MAY I ask you a question ?have you ever read THE GITA ?? I mean the Srimad BHagavadgita ???
    THE GITA upadesh given by LORD KRISHNA before the war?
    Please read the ten chapter – where He reveals his divine manifestation.
    There the lord says in 31st slokha –
    pavanab pavatam asmi ramah sastrabhrtam aham
    jhasanam makaras casmi srotasam asmi jahnavi

    It means” Among purifies , I am the wind, among wiellders of arms , I am Sri Rama .Among the fishes , I am the alligator and among streams ,, I am the Ganges ”

    With thanks and regards- Sara

  27. Veena

    Hi everyone – one more week to go . KEEP watching SKR as time for departure has come for 4 brothers.
    Loved Laxman’s dialogue .
    @ samarth -have you ever read THE GITA ?? YOU will get your answers .
    @ Supreetha – thanks .

  28. Sara

    yes 300 episode is on MONDAY -wow 300 episode of SKR!!
    Supreetha-thanks and happy diwali
    @samarth . Hope you have read the TEN CHAPTER OF THE GITA > THE GITA UPADESH /message given by LORD KRISHNA
    31st SLokha of ten Chapter of THE GITA says-
    Pavanah pavatam asmi ramah sastrabhttam aham
    jhasanam makaras casmi srotasam asmi jahnavi

    MEaning- Among purifiers ,I am the wind; Among the wielders of arms : I am Sri Rama. Among fishes , I am the alligator ; among streams , I am the Ganges”

    By the way,@ Samarth – SKR has shown LOrd Ram very beautifully – depicted most of his good side . And Ramanad Sagar showed Tulsidas Ramayan that is why the CHaya Sita was shown during 1st agnipariksha .

  29. Stuti27

    |Registered Member

    Only one week left sadly. Guys my request plz comment on the last epi of skr …..
    Anyways a very happy Diwali to all of u ….. may this Diwali bring light to ur lives …..

  30. Rani

    OMG -300 episode -congratulation to everyone of SKR team. You have exceeded the Start plus Mahabharat – i think it showed only 297 episode.
    Last year NOV , SKR started off – so one year completion .HAPPY BIRTHDAY SKR in advance .
    @ samarth -as pointed out by Sara please read THE GITA And also BHagavata PURNA – it is one among Hindu’s eighteen Puranas. WONDERFUL . Validated by Adi SHakara .

    @ PURANA means ancient- unreal stuff of Modern era are not ancients .So again mentioning adding the tag of Puranas or Upanishad does not mean it really becomes Puranas.
    @ Samarth please read – if possible Astavakra GITA – dialogue between Raj Rishi Janak and Yaknavalka .
    @Samarth – Ramanad Sagar is the best as per you but I disagree as it showed the Tulsidas version – ORIGINAL version is composed by ADi KAvbi/poet Sage Valmiki .
    And Tulsidas as a great devotee of Sri Ram could not accept the fact that Ram could ask for agniparksha from MATA SITA after the war, so he invented the idea of CHAYA SITA . Ramanad Sagar showed that version so how come they are better than SKR ??
    Just because SKR showed that Sita is bold enough to raise few questions -you are saying SKR has degraded the image of Sri Ram , rather I would say they portrayed a better image of Sri RAM than what SAGE VALMIKI HAD DONE in the original version.
    Every Television serial shows some variations in a way they prompt us to read books . SO WE MUST READ good books written by Sages or Saints , originals and not imaginative versions .

    Take care all of you- enjoy diwali -please avoid crackers but even if you do -please maintain safety . HEALTH COMES first so take precautions .

  31. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    Yes I had written the geeta and bhagwat puran too……and yes I request you to read the tulsidas ramayana reason being that was signed by Lord Shiva himself and if you think that lord Shiva could do accept wrong then there is no point to argue with you….so you are misguided as you are believing everything you like and skr hhas poorly presented shri Rama and Sita both..m they modified into to the scenario of this time and hence lost the authencity…..and yes tulsidas and valmiki ramayana are the best and at last if you agree or not shri Ram was indeed purna avatar because to be called some scripture as upnishad or puran require authencity so here is suggestion come out of your feeling of being superior lord krishna was indeed great and purna avatar but this does not mean that shri Rama was not as 6 gunas are required to be called as purna avatar not kalas….rest Is your wish….because one day or the other you will be accepting yourself the points raised by me….so from now I won’t post anything on this discussion…Jai Siya Ram

    • Rahul Mishra

      @ Samarth Understanding of scriptual will gradually degrade by the time but your efforts are praiseworthy. I want to put some analysis about Sita ji role in Ramayan.
      Rishi Valmiki and Tulsidas Ji both have not mentioned Laxman Rekha but if we read both of scriptural we found that Sita Haran was a divine plan. Sita thought that Ram is in danger and someone has attacked upon him. How…??? Ram lifted Danush in front of Sita, Ram killed Khar Dushan in fornt (in knowledge) of Sita. Ram killed 14,000 rakshas in front of Sita. So many examples are for Ram valor but Sita in stage of anxiety refused all and forced Laxman to go in search of Ram and after refusal of Laxman she put character allegation on Laxman which was not bearable to him. This incident is supported by Valmiki Ramayan, Adhyatam Ramayan and Anand Ramayan. Tuslidas can’t write this about Sita so he simple put Maram Vachan Jab Sitahi bola… and further …
      I several times thought when Sita doubted on Ram valor and Laxman intention then how she was so assured that both will come to Lanka and will rescue her. Sita words of anxiety was simple reflection of her inner physical form (bhu devi) while her satva form (Sri devi) was with Agni or with Rama hearts. Therefore Chhaya Sita concept is not wrong. She was indeed Sita’ chhaya (just body) because the inner consensuses (Sri) was separated before haran and during Agni Pariksha both forms again reunited. People misinterpreted that Sita was daughter of Bhumi. No …. Sita was Bhu Devi herself with power of Sri Devi (some may say Yogmaya).

  32. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    It was a political issue firstly because it was not like only Ram accepted sita but it was about that our king accepted the Queen…..so when the titles queen and king are attached then your public life becomes more important she was the Queen although she has done nothing wrong but the question which were raised were Why did she cross the Lakshman rekha although she was fully aware of the atmosphere of jungle……and they say that even when queen has wrong way…than the society will go on the moves taken by her means they will loose the character and will move on wrong path and will justify their deeds by mata’s name…..and that was the only reason that people want her to be pure as she will be the role model for all and yes the character of Queen and king need necessarily to be clean that’s not like the politics of this time…that you maybe accused of murder, or other charges and you hold your position….that was like that queen and king were role models and I know you may say that Sri Ram presented a wrong way….but no he didn’t….if you have any charges against you you need to prove yourself with solid proof…..and that solid proof was not present as there was no AGNIPARIKSHA..which means no proof of chasity was given till now…..as you may refer to Ramayana only authentic one not of devdutt patnaik where it is clearly mention that shri Rama take back his sita and returned chaya sita to agnidev..if you don’t know about this then let me tell you that after killing khardushan shri Rama make the agniparvesh of maa sita and that he take back after killing RAVANA but some people make it AGNIPARIKSHA and people believe on that…..and 2nd Sri Ram sita are considered as most divine and understanding couple and they did have a discussion on praja’s happening and doubt and after that maa sita left for valmiki ashram as Lakshman ji were commanded to leave her near valmiki ashram……and 2ndly maa sita’s character was prove chaste after mother earth but and praja repent also….but that was too late…so all this happen due to her being status as Queen
    Now come to today’s scenario…….we have laws for rape and all such things….now there is a possibility that some might use it in wrong way so those who are right have to present the solid proof to win the case…and chaste basically means the person who is pure in inner self not to the outer body…and if we start giving punishment to those who are innocent but any wrong person had put allegations of him…let’s assume a girl accused rape charges on a male because of his personal conflict we can’t punish him directly but if doesn’t prove himself to be innocent how a person can be termed as innocent and yes trust is not a solid proof of being called innocent if we don’t demand proof from both sides..where would this society lead to…so one need to prove her chasity when he is accused of something…..and about reforms he was known as most just king and if solid proof were given then he had actually saved the life and accept the fact that not just women but a men if is accused of something he or she has to prove her chaste

  33. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    It was a political issue firstly because it was not like only Ram accepted sita but it was about that our king accepted the Queen…..so when the titles queen and king are attached then your public life becomes more important she was the Queen although she has done nothing wrong but the question which were raised were Why did she cross the Lakshman rekha although she was fully aware of the atmosphere of jungle……and they say that even when queen has wrong way…than the society will go on the moves taken by her means they will loose the character and will move on wrong path and will justify their deeds by mata’s name…..and that was the only reason that people want her to be pure as she will be the role model for all and yes the character of Queen and king need necessarily to be clean that’s not like the politics of this time…that you maybe accused of murder, or other charges and you hold your position….that was like that queen and king were role models and I know you may say that Sri Ram presented a wrong way….but no he didn’t….if you have any charges against you you need to prove yourself with solid proof…..and that solid proof was not present as there was no AGNIPARIKSHA..which means no proof of chasity was given till now…..as you may refer to Ramayana only authentic one not of devdutt patnaik where it is clearly mention that shri Rama take back his sita and returned chaya sita to agnidev..if you don’t know about this then let me tell you that after killing khardushan shri Rama make the agniparvesh of maa sita and that he take back after killing RAVANA but some people make it AGNIPARIKSHA and people believe on that…..and 2nd Sri Ram sita are considered as most divine and understanding couple and they did have a discussion on praja’s happening and doubt and after that maa sita left for valmiki ashram as Lakshman ji were commanded to leave her near valmiki ashram……and 2ndly maa sita’s character was prove chaste after mother earth but and praja repent also….but that was too late…so all this happen due to her being status as Queen
    Now come to today’s scenario…….we have laws for rape and all such things….now there is a possibility that some might use it in wrong way so those who are right have to present the solid proof to win the case…and chaste basically means the person who is pure in inner self not to the outer body…and if we start giving punishment to those who are innocent but any wrong person had put allegations of him…let’s assume a girl accused rape charges on a male because of his personal conflict we can’t punish him directly but if doesn’t prove himself to be innocent how a person can be termed as innocent and yes trust is not a solid proof of being called innocent if we don’t demand proof from both sides..where would this society lead to…so one need to prove her chasity when he is accused of something…..and about reforms he was known as most just king and if solid proof were given then he had actually saved the life and accept the fact that not just women but a men if is accused of something he or she has to prove her chaste…..that’s also another point of that

  34. vaidehi

    Happy Diwali to all…….. May lakshminarayan bless u all time…… Wishing u all a safe and lighting Diwali…….

    From vaidehi & siya ke ram……..

  35. Veena

    HELLO everyone- how is diwali ?? Lots of sweets ???
    You are right-RANI -It is indeed going to be one year completion of SKR -HAPPY BIRTHDAY to the entire team of SKR . you are going to cross 300 -SUPERB.
    @ Sara – I shall like to add – The Bhagawat GITA is recited by many but in reality Lord Krishna transmitted all the conditions to Arjun and then showed his VISHWAROOP . It is therefore should read from heart .sitting in a meditation pose -voice should come out from naval while reciting with hands folded and in remembrance of lord.
    @ Samarth- about Avatar . Avatar is a special representative of GOD , sent for specific purpose with special powers required at that point of time . It is not about GUNAS as you have said.]
    When Kalki avatar will come at the time of Mahapralaya – he shall have a weapon like a plough/axe – and HE SHALL be the most powerful of all Avatars .So every other avatar supersede the previous one. All is mentioned in Bhagawat PURAN-please go through it .
    @Samarth – you know SAGE VAISHIT -Ayodha’s kul Guru is one among the Saptarishi – He could see the future as shown in SKR too. But Ram can’t visualize the future as HE IS NOT PURNA AVATAR . Ram could not visualize what would happen during his crown ceremony, when Marich took the form of golden deer -brother LAxman warned RAm that it must be a maya as Laxman is symbol of conscience but could not see Marich .
    ALL 4 brothers together make it COMPLETE due to that putra yagna KHEER factor
    At least , In SKR it is shown that Ram gets dreams but in reality he could not . SKR HAS indeed shown a nice picture of SRI RAM.
    I can give you lots of example but Rani & sara had already said a lot . Please try to understand and read correct books .
    Mata Sita makes Lord Ram purna -Mata is symbol of Absolute Shakti – without her , Lord is incomplete that’s why Siye ke Ram.
    And Marriage is between two person and if one person abandons another -then the marriage is broken . SIta never ever mentioned father name to his sons because of this factor of Paritayag so SKR showed SITA saying I am no longer your wife – is CORRECT only . Because of SIta’s sacrifice by going to MOTHER EARTH , her son luv & KUsh got their identity other.
    @ Samarth – as you know , Ram demanded 2nd time agnipariksha as per Sage Valmiki’s version – so suppose Sita had NOT gone to Mother EARTH to prove her chastity and then Would Ram accepted her as a wife ? Would Ram accepted his sons as his sons ????NEVER .SO question of good or bad husband does not arise .
    Sorry samartha bhai He was a kind , honest king, Mariyada purushottam but failed as a husband . A husband becomes husband when he fulfills his duties as a husband that is taking care of his wife , giving her protection & dignity and also taking care of kids .Ram did not do any of these duties -Ram did not take care of his wife -deserted her , by abandonment of SIta – He did not protect Sita’s dignity rather sided with dhobi in public and did not do father’s duties . And also did not give protection as sita was left alone in a forest.
    So argument must end here .
    I too like bold SKR SITA”S question – wonderful presentation by SKR team .

  36. joy

    HAPPY DIWALI…………. WISHING HAPPINESS IN YOUR LIFE AND YOUR FAMILY………………. BEST OF LUCK………

  37. Pradeep

    Whats going on … Guys!! I am surprised, lots of different thinking for the Puranas, Avatars, Relationships etc…. It is good to hear that all you younger guys (I hope so…) has read the Mythological books & you are spreading whatever you have learnt as per your perspective among each others.
    Regarding Avatars of Lord, I want to say that all the avatars has taken as per the situation or demand of that particular Yug or the Demons wishes to die. There is not a question of whether its a Purana Avatar or not. In Treta Yuga, Ravan has asked the Boon from Brahma dev about the condition of his death i.e. by any Human being or Monkeys. So, this is the only reason Vishnu dev has taken the form of Human being without any supreme power to let the world knows that It is not necessary to have a supreme power to formalize the Dharma in the society.
    But, in Dwapar Yuga, there is no specific condition to kill the demons, so May be Lord Vishu has taken the birth with all supreme power.

  38. Pradeep

    Shree Ram is being worshiped along with Sita Mata, Lakshman & Hanuman…. I believe that Shree Ram has taught the value of Relations among the society… The Love between Husband – Wife, Love with brothers, Love with his Devotee…. That is the only reason where Ramayan is being listened & reading in the family. All the puranas has different views like all of you guyz has explained above. This is our mind only to decide what is correct or what is wrong. So, beside arguing with each other, it would be better to accept each other feelings & emotions.
    JAI SIYA RAM…. JAI SHRI KRISHNA…

  39. Pradeep

    Now, this discussions has become the fights between the Men & Women prestige. This is not correct way to think.. Men & Women are equally valued in the Society which is an Universal Truth. This is our own mind only to whether this Truth is to accept or not.

  40. Anushya

    |Registered Member

    A very happy diwali to all my lovely sisters and brothers… hope you all will forgive me for being so irregular in comments…. I feel so sad by not seeing Siya…. thank god for seethaaiyin raman ill be able to cheer up somewhat… Once again happy Deepawali… welcome Ram Sita and Lakshman to your homes once again!

  41. Pujith

    Happy diwali to all of you……hope you all remember me…how are you all ?
    Enjoy thus day.
    And this day may bring a lot of hapiness in our lives.☺❇✨❇☺

  42. Richu

    |Registered Member

    Guyzzz wish u all a very happy diwali…
    Sry for not being here…..
    May this day bring lots of happiness to u all!!!

    From
    Richanshi mishra💖

  43. Stuti27

    |Registered Member

    Sorry guys! These two days didn’t comment coz of Diwali celebrations ….. making sweets, bursting crackers, lighting diyas etc ….. hope u guys had a happy and a safe Diwali ……
    Anushya dearie belated happy birthday ….. I’m very sorry fr late wishing ..S

  44. Rani

    Hi all- how was Diwali Celebration?? Hope all had wonderful time out.
    And yes, waiting for completion of 300 episodes of SKR- GOOD
    but sad to think -now Laxman has to go- feel so sorry for Urmila . Laxman’s life was dedicated to his brother so he suffered in silence , first got separated from his wife & mother but then it was his own decision . Again he suffered mainly due to Sita ‘s second vanvas . He wanted to punish dhobi or teach him a lesson but Raja Ram objected .Laxman was ordered to leave Bhabhi mata Sita to forest and laxman was rebuked by his own wife Urmila – all happened due to RAJA RAM
    Urmila had to get separated by his Husband for 14 years also with her Sitadi , but again with Sitadi forever due to Raja Ram’s order And poor girl -she shall now become widow.
    I had a question to all viewers -We all know what Happened to Devi Sita but what happened to DHOBI”S wife ??
    @ Samarth bhaiya & Pradeep bhaiya – you were in favour of Raja Ram’s decision of sending Sita to 2nd exile – CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT happened to that Dhobi’s wife ??
    Dhobi overruled Raja Ram’s verdict of accepting his wife rather questioned about SIta’s chastity . And in turn Raja Ram abandoned his own wife SITA . We know about SITA .
    What happened to Dhobi badra’s wife ?? Did she get justice ??Dhobi already abandoned his wife . WAS it right on the part of Dhobi to abandon his wife ?? NO because Raja Ram himself ordered Dhobi to accept his wife but Dhobi disagreed rather he gave character allegation about DEVI SITA .
    @ Samarth & Pradeep bhaiya – Dhobi is one of the praja of Ayodha & his wife too ??
    THat means dhobi’s wife as a praja of Ayodha was also subjected to injustice by Ram’s act of sending Sita to 2nd exile – correct??
    @Samarth & pradeep bhaiya – it shows Raja Ram’s decision to abandon SIta not only made Sita suffer , Ram’s entire family suffered and Dhobi’s wife sufffered . Who gained ? Only the wrong person DHOBI…is it justice ???But Dhobi was not punished …is it justice ???

    And about – Purna Avatar- no comments . Only thing Avatar are representative of GOD – are born for specific purpose to do specific work with special powers depending upon the need of time & nature . And for more please read Bhagawat Puran.

    Thanks & regards to all of you .
    Have a wonderful festive time.

  45. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    @ rani about dhobi’s wife I would just say that shri Rama could not forcefully order Dhobi to live with his wife…and even if she lived with him what about the regular insults by Dhobi which she has to bear….anyways as I have already said given many reasons which proves his decision to be true…but this also led to change in society too…and yes if you think that he was wrong just try to imagine yourself in his situation as well….anyways I am waiting for the day when ramayana will be shown in complete details…as there is no Ramayana made till now which presents each and every aspect of every character

  46. Samarth

    |Registered Member

    And justice is not made only on your instincts but we have to look upon various proofs as well…so that is also the point….but I must say to you all that I have also got to think upon various perspectives due to your questions….

  47. Pujith209

    |Registered Member

    Nice episode. And now lakshman is going to die. Hope you all celebrated diwali very well. And still only four episodes are remaining.

    Wish you a happy beleated birthday anushya di……be happy…

Your comment will now be reviewed first before it's published. Read more here..

Your comment will now be reviewed first before it's published. Read more here..