Siya Ke Ram 12th May 2016 Written Episode Update

Siya Ke Ram 12th May 2016 Written Episode, Written Update on TellyUpdates.com

The Episode starts with Ram waiting for Sita’s return. Surpanakha comes there. She asks you here. She says I did big mistake to do this, such behavior does not suit any woman, I came to apologize, I want to say you are my love, life partner, my everything, I have dedicated my heart, body and soul to you. He turns away and says but you have no place in my life, why did you come here, I got to know the truth, you are Raavan’s sister Surpanakha.

She says you would be thinking why I have hidden this, Raavan is your enemy, enemy’s sister is in love with you, I was afraid you will not accept me knowing this truth, but the truth is Raavan is my enemy too, he ruined my life. I have hope of my life’s completeness from you, so I want to come to you, I know you are married, but I have no problem

in becoming your second wife, marry me, I will always support you, even in killing Raavan. He says Devi, you are mistaken in knowing me, Sita is my wife, she will always be my wife, my life has no place for any other woman, except Sita.

She gets angry and cries. She asks him to say, where shall I go, I have left everything and came here, thinking you will accept me, but you are insulting my emotions, tell me where shall I go. He asks her to return to Lanka, your brother will find a suitable groom for you. She asks is my insult not enough, that you are cursing me, if anyone takes your place in my life, its better that I do. He says Devi… She is about to hit her neck and asks him to save her, only when he is ready to marry her. He walks to her and she gets away. He takes the knife away and throws it. He says my decision is final, your attempts to change it are waste, Sita will always be my wife, no one can take her place, I request you to leave from here, this will be right for you. She gets angry.

Vishravas says your wife Mandodari has called me here, its your bad fate that you are not able to understand her love. Raavan says nothing can be obtained by love, this Lanka did not form by love, I have loved Mahadev and seen what I got, I got nothing. That’s why Lankesh decides his own path, this is my Rajya and I will decide everything, whatever happens without my permission will be against me. He says you may have got your answers, come I will drop you till the door. Vishravas says no need, I know the exit door. He greets Mahadev and leaves.

Sita is at the hut. Ram asks her to have the fruits. She says I will make food for you first. He says no, you always cook food for me, its my duty to serve you fruits first, as its your fast. She says its my good luck. He asks her to come. They sit. Surpanakha looks on and thinks this is the same lady who met me at lake. Ram asks Sita about her fast and puja. Sita says it was nice, I told the women about Mahadev, Parvati and Sati’s story. She finds Ram worried and asks what happened, what are you thinking. Ram thinks Sita will be worried knowing Surpanakha’s matter. He says nothing, I was missing you. She says you got sad by thinking about me, I will not go in puja tomorrow. He says you have sworn to complete fasts, you surely go. He gives her fruits. She eats it. Surpanakha thinks to wait for right time, Sita has to get away from Ram now.

She goes to her place and says I have to kill Sita soon, so that Ram can become mine, and I can become Ram’s. Her inner soul says if you kill Sita, you will lose Ram forever. Surpanakha says but Sita is the only hurdle. Her inner self says just Sita can make you connect with Ram, find out why Ram loves her, what are her good things that Ram likes her, then Ram will like you too. Surpanakha says yes, you are right, if I kill Sita, how will I know her good qualities. Sita tells Ram that she will come back soon and asks him to have breakfast, she has prepared it. He says sure. She leaves.

Sita does the Shiv puja. Surpanakha comes there and looks at Sita. Laxman is also there. Sita gives Prasad to Laxman and others. The lady says your husband loves you a lot, what is the secret of this love. Sita says no secret, its Ram’s quality to see just good things of a person, not bad things. Surpanakha thinks to show her good qualities to Ram. Sita tells about love, there should be no greed, selfishness and jealousy, Ram and I trust each other, that’s why our trust is unbreakable. Surpanakha thinks I have to assure Ram of my love, I have to make him believe that my love is higher than Sita’s. The lady says we will succeed in getting husband’s love following your words. Sita tells about dedication towards husband. Surpanakha thanks Sita in heart and thinks I know what to do to get Ram. Sita looks at her.

Surpanakha turns. Sita calls her to give Prasad. Surpanakha runs away. Sita says take Prasad and go. Laxman asks what happened. Sita says Laxman, that woman… its strange thing, she came in puja and left without taking Mahadev’s Prasad.

Surpanakha goes to Ram and calls out Ram as Raghunandan. He says Sita came back so soon. He turns to see and says sorry Devi, who are you. Surpanakha dresses in Sanyasi clothes as Sita and he gets shocked. He says Surpanakha. She says you like this avatar of Sita, so I got this avatar for you, so that you don’t reject me now, I have given up everything like Sita’s, I m not related to my family, I will stay wherever you keep me. He says you are misunderstanding my tolerance, don’t make me helpless by this bad behavior, I m silent as you are a woman. She says I will accept your punishment, I will live as you want. He asks her not to say a word and leave. She thinks Ram did not do this right and leaves angrily.

Precap:
Laxman scolds Surpanakha and attacks. Her nose gets cut. Sita says this punishment was not right, you have hurt a woman’s esteem, this will result in something dangerous.

Update Credit to: Amena

199 comments

  1. SKR fan

    Nice episode. Siyaram scenes were very good. Surpnakha’s all attempts will be useless. Ram had one and only one wife and the world respects his this quality. Ram asked sita first to eat . That’s why he is called MARYAADA PUROSHOTTAM.

  2. Wah ! Coolio episode !! Actually shud say best epi. Say Shri ram first tym being angry to a woman. 😉 won’t be able to miss tomorrow ‘s episode . (Lakshman Bhai pls go out of station or else you won’t be able to bear the scoldings of ur bhabhi ???)

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Ur wlcm madirakshi mam

      Grt epi.. Surpankha wanna kill siya.. I wanna kill her.. I laughed at her so much that mom told me to stop it.. Coz she couldn’t hr d dialogue properly coz of my laughing ?….
      n malvi di ur comment lso lol ? made me laugh…

      Thnx skr fan for links..
      N sathi di don’t insult Draupadi.. She did according to the situation.. NT hr fault at all..
      Sarayu di Lakshman did what was right according to him.. But Surpankha could b punished other way also..

      N Vanshika Arora di… I to agree Surpankha n get evil separated Siam.. Foolish lady.. I ht Hr …

      Stuti di I agree Surpankha is so much stubborn.. Her name should b stubborn or ahenkari…

  3. vanshika arora

    Episode ws really nice…bt i knew that ram would send surpanakha 2 laxman.bt here they didn’t show it.though surpanakha wasn’t succeeded in getting ram, bt she was succeeded in separating ram-sita.sita had nothing to do With d whole matter, bt unfortunately she had to bear d punishment.

    • vanshika arora

      Actually surpanakha deserved punishment.. Bt mutilating her wasn’t d right decision. Laxman himself admitted dat he wanted 2 cut her nails bt mistakenly cut her nose.if he had cut her bails dat would be a deserved punishment fr her cz she had killed many people by ds nails.bt laxman in anger did d opposite.

  4. sathi

    Radha,Rukmini,Satyabhama,Jambavati,Kalindi,Mitravinda,Nagnajiti,Bhadra,Lakshmanaandother 16,000 or 16,100 juniorqueens…itne bibi tha krishna ke..

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Sathi di plz plz don’t insult Draupadi.. She h had been insulted enough her life.. N if a man ? could marry so many women.. Wt sin did Draupadi commit.. She acted as per the situation and acc to dharma.. What is disgusting in praying a shiv ling…n Draupadi nvr j had a cheap relationship.
      she was s supported by lord Krishna dn wat is our right to oppose hr…
      She always loved all pandavas… Evn if she loved Arjun d most she didn’t ht anyone.. N Sri Krishna didn’t marry Radha coz dn he wouldn’t b able to establish peace n dharma… He loved hr n dats y v say Radha Krishna today also…

      • Vanshika crzy fr skr

        N Krishna ji married 16000 princess ? to save them frm social injustice.. Lyk siya had faced fr being in another man’s place.. Those princess would not gt married ? coz dy hd styd wid a demon.. N Krishna saved n married dm.. It’s a great thing…… V don’t need to worry

      • Vanshika crzy fr skr

        No one will accept mythology’s insult n mockery hr… Ok sathi di… I knw u ccn xprss ur views bt nt lyk dt… Sry if I hurt ny1 .. N not only Krishna ji many ppl hd so mny wives…

      • vanshika arora

        Right..we can no way insult a woman like draupodi.she had no other way left.dat’s why she married 5 pandavs.was Krishna a king? Cz he ws d younger son.

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Yes Krishna was dwarkadheesh/king of dwarka.. He was favoured for the throne by his family n common people so he became king n balrama was not real bro of Krishna.. Krishna was devki n vasudev preference for d throne… So he was king and rukmini his fav queen ?

    • Vanshu was right that was the reason he saved those girls by marrying them as he had no option left to save them…..

    • Nabanita

      Sathi I think you don’t read yesterday’s page’s priya’s answer to you and your cheap mentality.so you dare to post the same comment in today’s page again.first do that and then tell with us.

    • Nabanita

      Sathi we know the name of the queen’s of our Lord krishna.so don’t explain us plz.and we don’t tell you to believe our Lord krishna or Shiva.and for your kind information I tell you a short storý. You will been heer the name of swami vivekananda.once a hindu king ask swami vivekananda why we worship a doll shaped so call murti of God?swamiji don’t say anything .he just orders the Kong’s minister to split on the picture of the king that was not possible for the minister of the king.then swamiji tell the king that “a picks mean only some paper and colour.I don’t tell your minister to split on your face.but he was unable to do that becoz doing that we thought about the king like that when we worship the shilv kings we belive the Lord Shiva is forward us and the God is seeing us.” I thinkthis is enough for you????

    • Nabanita

      Sathi I think you does not posses some minimum power to understand the relationship between krishna and radha.so urgueing with you is none other than a huge timeloss for us????? we are standing in 20th century.and I belive we all should have our own point of view about every topic.but it does not means that we can say anything to anywhere about an’t topic.so plz take care about this from next time.??????

    • Nabanita

      I don’t know from which religion you belongs to.but I think this time you required a book very much.that is “wings of fire”(the autobiography of sir A.P.J Abdul kalam)this book’s first part’s concept and ideas about spiritual may be help you to remake your’s idea. And we hope next time before telling anything about this you will think twice?????.

    • Meghana

      Sathi dear pls I request nt to comment again I agree wth vanshu pls pls pls don’t insult gods and Hinduism u ll surely deserve it soon don’t hurt any of us don’t comment again this is my humble request

    • Meghana

      Sathi dear I think u did not see my comment strdy first of all know the truth and then speak tdy v wasted our time answer ing u

    • Yes stuti u r ryt draupadi married them without no option left for her to save one family from being separated……. But atlast bcoz of that she faced many hurdles which should not be faced by a girl in her lifetime??

    • There are some ladies to whom lord ram gave promise in his rama avatar that he will marry him in his Krishna avatar as the ladies were interested in ram. At least we shud happy that he is able to fulfill these wishes. Some people won’t understand di. But nothing can be done 🙁 🙁

  5. stuti

    Nyc epi but I hated surpanakha’s attitude ….. really stubborn ….. wanted 2 kill mata sita …. tmrw her nose will get cut by lakshman …… waiting fr tmrw’s epi

  6. SKR fan

    Madirakshi tweeted:-
    I want to thank you all very much from d bottom of my heart for the outpouring of love, support and prayer., I am feeling much better:) Love

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      R u commenting for the first time……

      Evry1 waits for nxt part… N I’m also waiting for tmrw epi… Surpankha.. Ur nose ? is gone…

  7. Vanshika crzy fr skr

    Siya’s attire and style doesn’t suit Surpankha….

    She had gone mad ?…

    N ram must hv punished her..

    How cn he hv so mch tolerance?
    If I were dere.. I would hv probably cut off her nck nt nose ?
    Hey where is WW di…?

  8. stuti

    True vanshu she should hv been named ahankari or sumthin. I’ve never seen a lady like her …… ravan mad fr women nd she mad fr men that too a married ones ……. manthra, ravan, surpanakha, meghnad were the worst characters of ramayan.

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      After all ravan n Surpankha were siblings… Dey shared each others qualities like lust, ego, stubborn, proud, foolishness etc.. ????

  9. Vanshika crzy fr skr

    Stuti di ravan had ten heads so he is called dashannan- dash-ten n aanan-head in Sanskrit

    I lso ht Surpankha lyk many of us..
    But here is something about her..

    Plz read n comment

    Surpanakha is seen as a mere succubus by everyone. No one knows the real story of Surpanakha. She was terrifying and ugly. There are not many mentions of her in Ramayana. She was the younger child of Sage Visrava and his second wife Kaikesy and the sister of demon King Ravana. Some Hindu texts say that she was very beautiful as his mother. Parents gave her the name Meenakshi (one who has the beautiful eyes of fish). This shows she was pretty. According to many Hindu scholars, she is the most misunderstood character in Ramayana. We can surely say without any hesitation that if Surpanakha hadn’t come on the scene, the story of Ramayana would have been another. She seeded the main incident (battle between Rama and Ravana).

    surpanakha
    speakingtree.com

    Surpanakha; the Told Story

    Surpanakha was the youngest child of Visrava and Kaikesi. She was born as a succubus because her mother was one. She was very beautiful according to some texts. While Valmiki described her as a dark and ugly women. In Sanskrit, the word Surpanakha means one who has long and sharp nails.

    Following lines are the description of Surpanakha by Valmiki

    सुमुखम् दुर्मुखी रामम् वृत्त मध्यम् महोदरी || ३- १७ –९

    विशालाक्षम् विरूपाक्षी सुकेशम् ताम्र मूर्धजा |

    प्रियरूपम् विरूपा सा सुस्वरम् भैरव स्वना || ३- १७- १०

    तरुणम् दारुणा वृद्धा दक्षिणम् वाम भाषिणी |

    न्याय वृत्तम् सुदुर्वृत्ता प्रियम् अप्रिय दर्शना || ३ –१७ –११

    शरीरज समाविष्टा राक्षसी रामम् अब्रवीत् |

    Meaning: –

    She that demoness who is facially unpleasant one with that pleasant-faced one, pot- bellied one with the slim-waisted one, wry-eyed one with the broad-eyed one, coppery-haired one with the neatly dressed one, ugly featured one with the charming featured one, brassy voiced one with the gentle-voiced one, deplorably oldish one with the youngish one, crooked talker with the pleasant talker, ill-mannered one with the well-mannered one, uncouth one with couth, abominable one with amiable Rama spoke, besieged by Love-god. [3- 17- 9b, 11, 12a]

    Surpankha was married to an Asura, Dushtabudhi (some texts say his name was Vidyujjihva). He was a greedy person. He always tried to gain more and more. But he was killed by Ravana, his brother- in- law. Thus she became a widow. Her brother was the cause of her sorrow.

    Some years later, she happened to see Rama in Panchavadi. Rama was extremely beautiful. So she wanted to make him her husband. According to Valmiki, she had transformed herself into a beautiful woman and thereby losing her usual terrifying shape. She approached Rama and proposed him. But Rama followed Eka- Patni- Vritha (having one wife only). So he apologized Surpankha and said that his brother Lakshman was living without a wife now. He suggested her to approach Lakshmana.

    Lakshmana also followed Eka- Patini- Vritha and sent her back to the Rama. They decided to play a prank on her. At last, Surpanakha realized they were making her a laughing stock. She couldn’t tolerate it. Hence, she tried to attack Sita for she was the reason why Rama didn’t become her husband. That was her bad luck. Lakshmana, who saw her sister- in- law as the mother, became angry. He chopped her nose. Embarrassed Surpanakha got wounded also.

    She first went to one of her brother, Khara and told what happened. He became annoyed and rushed to Panchavadi. There were about fourteen- thousand Rakshasa with him. But all of them were sent to hell (or heaven) by Rama and Lakshmana. One of those fourteen- thousand and one Rakshasa didn’t die and fled to Lanka, where the palace of Ravana was located.

    There wasn’t anyone to help her except Ravana, her elder brother. She sought help from him and described the beauty of Sita. Women were the weakness of Ravana. So he became obsessed with the beauty of Sita. He wanted her to be with him. Then he kidnaped Sita and that’s how the epic battle was started.

    Here Valmiki put a full stop to the story of Surpanakha. But some other writers of Ramayana said about her after her nose- cutting incident.

    surpanakha
    amazonaws.com

    What Happened to Surpanakha After that?

    This is unknown to many of us. Everyone knows he planted the seed of the Rama- Ravana battle. Then where did she disappear?

    Some authors of alternative Ramayana states that she lived in Lanka with Vibheeshana, the new King after Ravana, even after the war. After some years, she and her half- sister, Kumbini were found dead in a sea.

    Did She have a Terrific Appearance?

    Actually, this is a topic of controversy. Because the first author of Ramayana wrote her as the ugliest ever in the world. Hope you read what the Sage had written about her. He said that Surpanakha was so terrifying and had a roaring voice.

    But Kamban, a Tamil poet wrote her as a beautiful woman. He mildly described Surpanakha. We can’t leave his work because the childhood name of Surpanakha was Meenakshi (woman with beautiful eyes of fish).

    The painter drew Surpanakha as a beautiful woman in the picture given below.

    surpanakha
    wikimedia.org

    Untold Facts about Surpanakha

    There are many interpretations and re- writings of Adikavya Ramayana. We can see some lesser known facts about Surpanakha in those works. Many of this books suggest that Surpanakha is the most misunderstood character in Ramayana.

    1. Her Real Intention was not to Get a Husband

    She didn’t have an intention to hurt Sita. Yes, some poets and critics said that she didn’t want Rama or Lakshmana as her husband. Then why did she propose Rama and Lakshmana? There is a sensible answer for this. Ravana killed her husband Dushtabudhi. He wouldn’t have killed him whatever be his nature was. Surpanakha waited for an apt occasion to end the monarch, Ravana. He was very powerful due to the boon given by Brahma. Hence, she couldn’t have touched him with an intention to kill. She knew it well and waited for years for a situation. When she heard about Rama who killed her Grand Mother (Thataka) and Uncle (Subahu), it was known to her that no one could defeat Rama. Hence, Surpanakha brilliantly made a reason to begin a fight between Rama and Ravana. Everything went as she thought.

    2. Her Love was Ridiculed

    Was she a real succubus? Did you ever read that Surpanakha was very cruel and she killed many? I didn’t. Although she was born in a Rakshasa family, she had not much nature of demons. Moreover, she gave value to feelings. Just think she was really fond of Rama. It is natural for a woman to fall in love. So she proposed Rama. But what did he do? He played a trick on her with his brother. They kicked her both ways. Why because she was thirsty. She had a thirst for love.

    3. She Suffered from Injustice

    Do you think what Lakshmana did to Surpanakha was right? I don’t think so. He cut her nose only because she proposed them. It was pure injustice. How indecent the proposal might be, doing this to a woman was not at all right. Nowadays we argue for women- rights. But our ancient text itself is a proof of molestation against women.

    4. Was Beauty a Reason for her Sorrow?

    Another possible thing for all that happened was related to beauty and submissiveness. Surpanakha was a middle- aged woman when she approached Rama and Lakshmana with the proposal. She wasn’t that much beautiful as young Sita. Being a member of Rakshasa family, she wasn’t submissive also. This might be a reason that she suffered a lot.

    5. Surpanakha Met Sita After the War

    In Devdutt Pattanaik’s Sita : An Illustrated Retelling Of The Ramayana, there is a chapter in which Surpanakha sees Sita. Sita was abandoned by Rama because his subjects doubted her chastity. She was left in a forest. That time Surpanakha saw Sita. There were hatred and revenge in her mind. But she didn’t hurt Sita. Instead she said that Rama and Lakshmana dumped Sita as they did to her. Sita wasn’t sad. She knew that Rama was bounded by rules and he hadn’t doubted her a bit. Then they became friends and enjoyed each other’s company.

    6. At last She became the Wife of Rama

    This may be the most unknown fact. In Bhramavaivrata Purana, it was written that Surpanakha penanced Brahma to get Rama as her husband in her next birth. Brahma gave her the boon. She was that maiden who served Krishna (the Avatar of Rama or Vishnu) with sincere devotion. Her name was Kubja who had three stoops on her backbone. Shri Krishna made those to disappear and hence she became more beautiful. She was one among Lord Krishna’s 16008 wives.

    7. She Wasn’t That Much Ugly

    Although she wasn’t that much beautiful as Sita, she wasn’t ugly. Many of us think her appearance was not good enough. Referring Kamba Ramayana will surely change your mindset. She was beautiful and had magical powers too.

    This is all.. Njoy reading… Sorry if its too long..

    Bt Surpankha will remain a fool only ??????☺

    • Srinidhi

      Surpanakha wasn’t a bad person, and neither was Raavan. I feel that SKR’s portrayal of them is not very accurate. I hav heard that Surpanakha was indeed beautiful. I don’t know the complete, accurate story of Surpanakha…still searching for it. I disagree with some of the info posted abt her above, such as how she was one of Krishna’s wives in her next birth. I’ve posted a comment earlier about the truth of Krishna’s wives.

      Srry if I said anything wrong Vanshu dear (or di)…but I’ve said what I know. Hope no one is hurt…

    • vanshika arora

      I think skr will show sita and surpanakha’s frndship like mr.devdutt’s book.cz skr shows everything in positive way.so at last dey’ll show surpanakha’s character also un positive way.

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Srinidhi di I don’t feel bad..n I m not hurt with my sis.. Bt seeing the Surpankha in skr , who rather looks lyk a fool I hd commented, I said she is fool how come she insult sita ma

    • Supreetha (Soups)

      I totally agree…Shurpanakha was just misunderstood. If asked if would say, Manthara and Shurpanakha are 2 characters in the Ramayana without whom Ramayana wouldn’t shave shaped tye way it has been 🙂

  10. Vanshika crzy fr skr

    Does ny1 know y takshashila is so called?

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    It was constructed at d time of Ramayana by taksha

    Taksha was one of d sons of Bharat n He got taksha-sila constructed…

    Ok ? a question…
    Name d other son of Bharat without cheating…

  11. guys pls visit yesterday’s page ….and see that satis cmnt plsss. and ans her back she is speaking Ill about our gods pls make her realize thats not right to speak about a god very badly… whoever not visited that page pls visit it..

    sati pls visit that page once or else I l post that here….

    and epi was Good but surpanaka making me feel irritated excited for tmr….

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      She commented I’ll in today’s page also
      I don’t know wat is d prblm wid sch guys,, Dey can’t respect ny1 if can’t rspct gods n mythology…

      Uff no use arguing wid dese ppl bt stll I scold her today

      • Yes vanshu the way I spoke to her tdy I didn’t spoke like that to anybody but her cmnt made me to lose my patience….. I m really feeling bad that in this generation also there r people who believe draupadi in that way …so I couldn’t tolerate it…so I spoke to her like that..I don’t know if I m wrong??

      • Yes di I saw ur cmnt also she is speaking ill about our epics against….. Pls see the cmnt and replies down….

    • Srinidhi

      Yes di I saw her comments..i have replied also…it is very saddening to see people badmouthing gods/people who were in reality extremely virtuous.

      • Yes dear but for me the most saddening think is in this generation also there are some people who think like karna…. I mean without knowing the undertruth he said draupadi vaisya but here without knowing the whole story she is saying draupadi cheap…

  12. I think u r not a Hindu if u r then u won’t speak like this… and I think u have not read mahabharat first read it and then address draupadi…. understand!!! and ya how could u say that she is cheap u know y she married five people to save one family from being separated and we all believe her as goddess u know what kind of pain she has gone threw without knowing those things how come u say she is cheap…

    pls mind ur language first….

    and ur name is sati and u r asking us that y we worship shivlinga…. we believe that our god are always with us and we don’t look that like a stone we believe it as Shiva himself…

    without knowing anything about our Purana’s u can’t raise ur hand against our belief…nor u can’t use the words like disgusting cheap and all ….and don’t u dare speak draupadi without knowing her life history….

    I never thought I l be rude like this with some body in my life but u r making me to use those words…. sry if I had hurt u ..but pls don’t speak Ill about anybody without knowing the correct reason its a request …we r worshipping as goddess so pls give respect to god…..plsssss use those words anywhere else not in our page… bcoz in our family we respect all….so pls … sry once again but I can’t control myself If anybody speak bad about our religion r our god as I respect all god…

  13. Sati I reposted this cmnt here …I didn’t meant to hurt u but I want u to understand that which women u r speaking about is our goddess whom we all r proud about so pls dear don’t speak like that don’t take me wrong

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Yup di no one will tk it rude as sathi di deserves it..
      How can ny1 use d words disgusting and cheap for of mythology n gods… It’s really disgusting thoughts… Sathi di u dint know anything abt our puranas so u need nt inslt Dem.. Ur thoughts r cheap, Draupadi is nt cheap she has done justice n dharma but she got s suffering n injustice all her life.. N u r abusing her… Not good it’s unfair if u wr in place of draupadi how ll u feel think first.. Tk it to u n dn comment.. U urself being a female r abusing a lady who has suffered.. Is to much.. Sorry sorry if I hurt u.. Bt u also hrt us..

      N if u wr lord Krishna.. N good minded as him u’ll hv married 16000 girls irrespective of their status

      N

      • Crct vanshu at draupadi s time the men I mean evil men only speak ill about her….. Even though in this period I have never thought that a girl will say such things about draupadi not even in my dream…. Bcoz we women l always think of draupadi life and cry seeing her pain.. First time I have seen a girl who instead feeling her pain saying bad about her… Really my anger is in up level now……

  14. Sati dear I just request u if u can’t believe our epics pls don’t insult those things…. It means a lot to us…u do one thing first go and read our epics and then come n cmnt here are else go n ask ur grandparents they l say u the history of draupadi… U know y am saying this if u come to know about her life history instead of saying her cheap ur eyes l be filled with tears… Bcoz whatever hpn with her never hpn with any women nor will hpn in future…. Pls dear u know what hpn in Mahabharata war whoever spoke ill about draupadi were killed mercilessly bcoz she is purer than purity itself…..

    Ya I agree that she married 5men but u know she was that much pure..which in this period even a single girl wont…

    So pls first go n read about her n then come here and cmnt bcoz I can’t tolerate even a single I’ll word about our epic and religion anymore…….

    Sry guys if anybody felt I m rude I can’t tolerate it more……. Sry sati once again I request. u pls don’t say draupadi is cheap u know she is pativrata….

    I hope u all understand y I cmntd like this…….

  15. Vinod

    Only hindu not muslim bhi pooja karta hai shivling ka makka in arab main muslim bhi pooja karta hai kaala pattar ka.

  16. sathi

    Dear,then tell me why ram left her wife sit a for 12 years…he didn’t accept her.that’s why she sacrifice her life.why he did that.

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Firstly siya herself went to forest as she couldn’t see that ppl speak ill of ram cos of her.. She faced social injustice bt didn’t want ram to face.. N even if ram sent her tho the forest he done this so that ppl don’t speak more ill of her. He loved siya n so he nvr married again, he ruled without a queen. He did what his conduct and dharma acc tho those day laws n h he didn’t want sita tho gv agnipariksha again, coz of hurted hr self respect.. N hw could under ppl lv without insulting her.. So tho sv hr slf rspct siya herself went acc to most version.. Some version shows that ram banished sita..

      • vanshika arora

        I’m sry bt i’ve downloaded valmiki uttara ramayan.there it’s clearly mentioned dat ram banished sita without informing her..later sita accepted it…other versions say she left voluntarily.

    • 1.Ram did that actually because he was concerned about the pupil than his relation.
      2.yes it is said that Krishna has 16ooo wife’s but in a situation when aswathama affects uttara’s womb.Krishna will tell”Oh God and goddess of world,if it is true that I am a bachelor,give life to that child “.and finally parikshit get life.so what does it mean?
      3.Radha and Krishna’s marriage is done in all the part of south India.
      4.Draupati married 5 men and lived with one person for a year but she has the power to become pure or virgin after the particular year.
      (Note: you get many questions in your mind regarding epic,I am ready to answer you, you can post your questions in any of my fanfiction page )

      • Janani di even we don’t have any problem with her qns but our problem is she is using ill words for the great God and goddess….. She said our Hindu belief as stupid beliefs we ans it politely but after one time we can’t control it she is using words like cheap and All… Sati u can qn us bt in a polite way bcoz we can’t tolerate ill words about our God and epic and religion…..

    • Guys one min please wait don’t ans to this qn actually me Jay di and all of them gave ans to this qn in yesterday page itself…. And sati I think u will ask only qns and u won’t read our reply for that If u would have read u won’t ask the same qn many times….

  17. sathi

    how can 5 brother marry a women.these brothers were not good.whatever the situation was.no one have right to play with women’s dignity…alright they marry her.what was the need to get son from each brother ….they just used her…arjun whom she loved.he marry 4 women.he did not deserve her love

    • Anil

      Sathi before asking a question read Ramayana and Mahabharata books….already priya,nabanita are given answer to ur question…. and u asking that question again…before asking a question about epic,knowledge little bit about that is necessary…. U can find answers by urself after u read Ramayana and Mahabharata books..

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Sati di omg plz read Mahabharata once I rqest u oderwise I’ll bcom ved vyasa 1fr u

      Panchali had married the 5 pandavas to sv Dem frm spration.. To nt hurt the obedience to kunti. N she did what lord wanted her to.. She was b born for the destruction of kuru lineage. Though she nvr wanted it.. Still she became it’s cause… Ok ? back to topic.. So she had to marry pandavas .. N suppose if a man has 5 wives would he just gv 1 child ?? No. Den why r u insulting a lady for doing so? If she gv only brth tho one kid then society would say that she is partial to the person who’s the father of the kid.. Even if pandavas gambled her away, they got its punishment, n a woman has good heart n she forgiven the pandavas.. I asked u to read Mahabharata bcoz Arjun has been described the best amongst all the pandavas, best warrior, most handsome, most intelligent, etc. (probably not most eater ????) n it was natural for a woman to fall in love with him seeing his qualities. This happened to Draupadi even. N Sri Krishna asked Arjun to marry subhadra coz otherwise Duryodhan must hv spoilt her life. Arjun knowing how bad Duryodhan was, married her. N he he’d married other 2 ladies also coz of the situation.. Arjun nvr wanted Draupadi tho b gambled like this.. But he had become a servant n couldn’t intervene.. He did intervene but in vain. N he loved Draupadi also, but loved Subhadra most. It is natural that love is bent to one person so everyone had a fav.. N whatever the pandavas did they were punished in van, by losing their beloved sons etc. Now u may ask y Draupadi faced all it among wid pandavas ? Coz his father want her to face all the troubles that r possible on this earth..

      • Vanshu one sec arjun loved draupadi more than subhadra u have seen star plus Mahabharata…. In that while marrying subhadra arjun l promise one thing that even though he is marrying subhadra his love for draupadi l increase instead of decreasing…. And u know in Mahabharata vyasa versio which I had read arjun draupadi r like ram siya…I mean arjun and draupadi had got love at first sight like ram siya…but arjun married subhadra in the insistence of Krishna…. And arjun started to love subhadra after marriage but in case of draupadi that’s love at first sight…I just want to clear that thing to u dear otherwise she l ask y draupadi didn’t leave arjun after knowing that he loves subhadra a lot…. So that I want to clear that Arjuna always loved draupadi the most and we l also say that panchali’s parth….hope u don’t mind dear. . ……

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      N I agree with Anil bro f first read Ramayana n Mahabharata n puarana ved etc.. Den find answers of ur question

    • Oh god pls read my reply to u first…… I say u once again pls read Mahabharat and then cmnt…. Without knowing about something don’t speak ill about out religion or about our epics.. This is the third I am saying u this so pls first do that and then comment pls another don’t cmnt without learning or understanding anything…. And one thing they didn’t play with her dignity understand!!! Draupadi does agnipariksha after one year before going to another husband…..

      To say u n simple way if u say that draupadi is not pure…. I l say u if draupadi is not pure then nobody in this world is pure….. First go and learn Mahabharat and then cmnt bcoz hereafter I can’t take one I’ll word against our epics… Sry if my words hunted u…

      • Yes,it is refered in a proverb that “Athu manala allinallum allalam arjunan manaiviaai enna pudiyathu”(it means we can even count the number of sand in seashore but could not count arjun’s wife’s”.
        The well known wife of arjun are draupati,ullubi,subathra,alli,pavalakodi,nagvidi and many more.

    • Nabanita

      Sathi before answering your question you first tell us you are from which side? First you say that Draupadi and her relationship is cheap and now you are coming to tell us about women’s dignity?

      • thejashri aka brindha

        Hey sathi before u say anything abt our epics first u read Ramayan n Mahabharat u will understand how many sacrifices they’ve made and pains they hv faced. And if u want to ask any question abt our religion we r ready to answer it but pls ask in a
        polite way. Many hv answered ur question read their answer it may help u but pls don’t insult our religion. Again I am saying pls read Mahabharat n Ramayan then only u will get answers for ur questions.

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Yes priya di Dey shwd in star plus mb that Arjun lvd hr bt in real he was mesmerised by subhadra beauty also.. Bt he nvr ht Draupadi. He lvd hr. I read in vyasa mb. A small qn (name one son of Arjun)

      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      He’ll probably b abhimanyu.. I don’t wanna hrt ny1 coz I’m bg fan of mb and skr n all god n myths.. But actually Arjun ws vry fond of abimamyu n so of subhadra.. But he also loved Draupadi.. Sorry to hurt u….

      Omg omg omg omg sathi di u r mad ? or wat.. First u disrespect Draupadi n den r caring for her dignity… U r sch a statement changer

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      N priya di didn’t Dey show that after marriage of Arjun and subhadra, they went to Indraprastha n Draupadi shot n arrow ? n fire ? n vice versa.. Bt actually subhadra went disguised as a milk maid n first she won Draupadi trust n den she told her identity afterwards… Star plus mb had many things shown wrong… Bt I was a bg fan n am even today… Sorry if I ever hurt u.. ??

  18. Srinidhi

    First of all, there is nothing disgusting about a shivling…it is a representation of Lord Shiva. Any vulgar interpretations are false. Secondly, Draupadi remained pure even though she married 5 pandavas…she would spend one year as one person’s wife, and at the end of the year, she would perform penance to purify herself. She had the boon to be reborn as a virgin each year. And finally, Krishna never had any wrong relationships (with Radha or anyone else) his wives were forms of Goddess Lakshmi, as he was the incarnation of Lord Vishnu. The reason he married those 16,100 princesses was that they had been held captive by Narakasura, and just because Krishna freed them, they didn’t get their honor back. So he married them to give back their honor, but never thought of them as actual wives. I hope that next time, before assuming something, you will double check to see that your assumptions are really true.

  19. Supreetha (Soups)

    Hey guys!!!! Sorry I didn’t text for a long time…was busy with work at home!!! I missed you all…..

  20. Rahul Mishra

    I am not getting a single reason why the serial SIYA ke RAM is portraying Laxman in bad light with less senses. at-least in eyes of Sita, Laxman has no value, while in authentic sources like Valmiki Ramayan and other this is not the case.

    I really do not like this version of Ramayan which has destroyed the essence of story just to satisfy modern feminism and activism.

    • Meghana

      No bro pls don’t think like that its a bhabi ‘s right to scold her devar but she won’t scold unnecessarily.

    • hi rahul if u don’t like the concept then who forced u to watch that and for ur kind info siya ke ram is on siya’s prespective so that they l give imp to women…. can I pls know wts ur prb actually with….. ur prb is not giving lakshman his value or showing a modern feminism….. sry I didn’t mean to hurt u ….but in this show they l show feminism a lot…..

    • Sanjana

      Laxman gets too anger and I hope u understand anger is not good in any era as it is not a solution but u need to raise ur voice to make people understand if kindness is not enough. Sita does that but see today epi then comment.

      • vanshika arora

        Totally agree with u…& d only reason of my watching skr is it’s frm sita’s perspective above all frm women’s perspective… We all get 2 see other ramayan bt it’s very rare 2 see frm a woman’s point of view…

    • Rahul,they won’t accept your views against siya ki ram because they like it so Mich,actually lakshman was the intelligent person among the characters of Ramayana.(sorry if this hurt any siya ki ram follower)

  21. Meghana

    The day we all r waiting has come surpanakha gets her gift from lakshman today eager to see tht

  22. Siya

    Sathi if u can’t respect our religion that no need to say anything because your type of people can’t understand…… Lord Krishna is Vishnu avatar and radha and Krishna bond is very pure love u will not understand so pls stop it…..

  23. Sanjana

    Guys u say shoorpanakha is not that bad but one thing I feel is her love is not true it is lust. just imagine how Sita accepted for swayamwar even when she loved ram. Her love was selfless. But shoorpanakha is trying to force love and love can never be forced . Maybe portrayal is a mistake but she maybe good but her love for ram was not true. And if I had time I have big analysis on this but I have got exams. So what’s ur take

  24. Sanjana

    Dear sathi even we have doubts in mythology but there’s a way to ask it and we will surely reply better anyways. Coming to Krishna and Radha there are many reasons explained that Radha didn’t want to leave village and even in today’s world people fall in love but when duty comes we need to go we have to so when people have to take such decisions Krishna can be remembered. They lead the way. And about the 16000 wives he accepted his devotees as wife and if u see in Ramayan when ram weeps for Sita the trees and other will try to console ram but ram will say that in his next Janam he will accept them in this birth it is just siya for him. So this is the foundation for that
    And this story is mentioned in book of ram by devdutt
    Draupdi u need to analyse the situations under which marriage happened. The worldly duties awaited them and draupdi as others have already mentioned the each year story and Arjun he married many others there were reasons but I respect Rams love for siya the most. And pls note Arjun is warrior of our epics not that we worship him so we have to learn from his imperfections if he has any. He was really a pure soul yes everybody considers other dharm first before Pati dharm and for that clarification I don’t feel u are in the mindset to listen if u are I will explain u first pls read this and about shiv ling a proper question pls state.
    And u say they used her I mean marriage is a union and children are born I don’t mean marriage is only for that but each were her husband and becoming pregnant is not only in ur hands it is gods blessing. And about Sita banishment see for ram rajya it was necessary in this case leave emotions and read it and it will be explained more elaborately in tonight’s update as I have to go now but yes ram banished Sita as u say but it was not Sita was against the decision. She knew her ram and eventuality and she accepted it with grace and born were the heroes luv and kush
    To be continued tonight.,.,,,,
    Guys pls I request don’t react angrily her way of asking is wrong but pls explain with ur knowledge. This is a platform for us to explain our gods

  25. hi guys good mrng…. as jay di is going to her native I was posting it in her behalf…..but that was written by jay di only I m pasting it here…..

    DHINAM ORU KURAL

    Haiiiiii Friendsssssss……….This Is Jay again with 5th Kural…..Thank you Frndz……….for all your supports

    Here we go with 5th couplet (Kural)….

    Chapter/Athikaram Name : கடவுள் வாழ்த்து/The Praise of God/Katavul Vaazhththu

    குறள் (Kural in Tamil)

    இருள்சேர் இருவினையும் சேரா இறைவன் பொருள்சேர் புகழ்புரிந்தார் மாட்டு

    Transliteration in English :

    Irulser Iruvinaiyum Seraa Iraivan Porulser Pukazhpurindhaar Maattu

    மு.வ உரை: 

    கடவுளின் உண்மைப் புகழை விரும்பி அன்பு செலுத்துகின்றவரிடம் அறியாமையால் விளையும் இருவகை வினையும் சேர்வதில்லை

    In Normal Words:
    இறைவன் என்பதற்குரிய பொருளைப் புரிந்து கொண்டு புகழ் பெற விரும்புகிறவர்கள், நன்மை தீமைகளை ஒரே அளவில் எதிர் கொள்வார்கள்

    Couplet in English:

    The men, who on the ‘King’s’ true praised delight to dwell, Affects not them the fruit of deeds done ill or well

    Explanation
    To those who meditate the feet of Him who is void of desire or aversion, evil shall never come

    Hope you understand the explanation …. Hope U Like it…..Have a nice Day Frndzzz…….

    CREDIT TO: jay di
    have a nyc day frns….

  26. Hi guys…. Actually jay di is out of station as u all know she went to her native so I m posting in her behalf….. But this was written by jay di only….

    DHINAM ORU KURAL

    Haiiiiii Friendsssssss……….This Is Jay again with 5th Kural…..Thank you Frndz……….for all your supports

    Here we go with 5th couplet (Kural)….

    Chapter/Athikaram Name : கடவுள் வாழ்த்து/The Praise of God/Katavul Vaazhththu

    குறள் (Kural in Tamil)

    இருள்சேர் இருவினையும் சேரா இறைவன் பொருள்சேர் புகழ்புரிந்தார் மாட்டு

    Transliteration in English :

    Irulser Iruvinaiyum Seraa Iraivan Porulser Pukazhpurindhaar Maattu

    மு.வ உரை: 

    கடவுளின் உண்மைப் புகழை விரும்பி அன்பு செலுத்துகின்றவரிடம் அறியாமையால் விளையும் இருவகை வினையும் சேர்வதில்லை

    In Normal Words:
    இறைவன் என்பதற்குரிய பொருளைப் புரிந்து கொண்டு புகழ் பெற விரும்புகிறவர்கள், நன்மை தீமைகளை ஒரே அளவில் எதிர் கொள்வார்கள்

    Couplet in English:

    The men, who on the ‘King’s’ true praised delight to dwell, Affects not them the fruit of deeds done ill or well

    Explanation
    To those who meditate the feet of Him who is void of desire or aversion, evil shall never come

    Hope you understand the explanation …. Hope U Like it…..Have a nice Day Frndzzz…….

    CREDIT TO: Jay di

  27. sathi

    kali,your goddess,she doesn’t wear nice cloths…she just wear little cloths.is this a good teaching for u?and priya i don’t need to learn anything from mahabharat or ramayan.both of them just teach war and insult of women’s dignity. why just women have to sacrifice.or drapadi could refuse to marry them.but she has to be mahan…just to keep safe from brothers separation she married 5 man at a time….i am not draupadi and 5 pandavs side.and i will comment….you r nobody to say me anything..

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Omg di u dnt seem to b affctd by our comments and reactions and feelings… Nw kali Mata… U cnt stop insulting gods… Uff.. Nw I ll hv to teach u in ur language… Cant u just mind ur language? Y Is tllyupdates posting such comments?????

      D epics dnt teach war Dey teach dat always good wins however hard evil tries… N sorry if I m gonna hrt ny1 in my comment.. Bt who are you to say this haan? Draupadi didn’t want that 5 bros get seperated coz of her n if she had a way to save Dem y she shouldn’t? N nt only woman man also suffered in the epics okay ?.. Ram ws seperated frm his blvd wife… He unwillingly had to do it.. N also pandavas lst dere family.. Dey wr equally insulted by Duryodhan kauravas… So plz don’t try to sprd atheism n u r committing a bid sin by hurting our feelings.. U know one thing.. Many non Hindus here r also commentin in favour of Hindu mythology n u jst insulting… Draupadi couldn’t refuse from marrying coz it was her destiny n it was written by her father earlier.. If u were ny character at dat tym u wuld hv feeled d suffering wich u r unable to feel today

    • Hi sathi how r u?.u must no knowing me ….let me introduce my self ..I’m zara I’m waiting for my 10th results which is on Sunday…..ohh u have soo many enemies hear dear……Thanks for ur opinion which u have given about lord Krishna radha draupadi and now maa kali…..ur mostly welcome here to comment because of u our comments increasing and my of our friends back here ……soo thank you very much dear……..and guys don’t to much we have plus point that over friends r started commenting again and comment started increasing? …….ok all sathi by dear take care …..

    • Omg u didn’t stop this harsh cmnts till now…. I m feeling guilt to talk to u like that till now but now I m not feeling guilt u deserve more than that I think…. U r speaking about goddess Kali in that way….. Ok u dont want to read our epics u dont have any right to bash that understand,…….and pls try to understand… Breaking of a family may be easy to u and the people who think like u ……but in our culture that’s really bad for us….and I m saying u another time don’t u dare to speak about draupadi…..we all thought that u will understand but we all r wrong u can’t understand….

      Guys we thought she l learn from our cmnts but her motive is to insult our epics guys what to do….I thought after knowing that ur motive l be to learn but u know ur motive is to insult our epic…..

      I thought to ignore ur cmnt but ur crsng ur limits next time I won’t be polite I l say the things straight forward don’t take me wrong and ya u didn’t heard that thing ham sabse kaise hai use dekhar hi Sab hamse behave karte hai but u know wt even though u r rudr from first out family members were really polite with u but u r taking advantage of that ….

      And ya I m saying u last time pls mind ur language……. Agar tumne dubara Hindu religion ke bare mein bura bola to him Sab chup nahi rahenge….. So pls dont take advantage of our politeness…….if u dont want to learn our epics then y r u wasting ur time by posting these type of cmnts..i m saying this last time if u dont have to read our epics u dnt havr right to speak bad about our gods… Oh god tu y r u posting such cmnts

    • thejashri aka brindha

      Hey sathi if u don’t want to learn from Ramayan n Mahabharat then its ur wish but we r not forcing u to learn. Since u asked us we just answered. U hv right to cmnt since this is public site but u hv no right to hurt others feelings.

    • And y r u seeing that like they r playing with women’s dignity see that in this way like they r showing women power and showing they r brave even though after going through such pain and sacrifices…. Dont see things in -ve see that in +be plss.

    • Srinidhi

      That is the way that artists choose to depict Kali…it is not necessarily what she actually wore.

      • Srinidhi

        As for the epics, there are deeper meanings to all the events that happened. One should try to take those meanings. They should learn from the lessons taught in the epics…

  28. Sanjana

    Childhood Sweethearts

    Bagri concludes: “So, Krishna knew of the physical Radha only till Krishna was 10. He never returned to Nandvan after that time. Radha did not travel to Dwaraka. In South India, there is no mention of Radha in the ancient texts. However there are several versions to it. One version says that they were married during childhood by Lord Brahma himself..
    Separated Self

    Howard continues: “We are constitutionally Krishna’s servants, and servants should never imitate the Master. Everything is Krishna’s property and naturally meant for Krishna’s enjoyment, so when we imitate Krishna, it’s a crime against reality. Separation in love makes the love more intense, so Krishna’s not being publicly married to Radha enhances their loving affair. Radha is Krishna’s eternally separated self, so their marriage is unnecessary.
    Love And Marriage Are Different

    Madhu Rao writes: Lord Krishna did not marry Radha to prove that Love and Marriage are two different things…love is a selfless emotion while marriage is an agreement or arrangement…
    Krishna And Radha Are Not Separate

    Prashant Jaiswal writes: Radha is not a separate individual from Krishna. You need two individuals to marry. Lord Krishna has various types of energies – his external energy is inferior energy and it’s Maya (Ma meaning not, ya meaning which, together meaning “something which is not real”. His internal potency (antaranga shakti) is Radha. Radha is Krishna’s energy, which pleases him and possesses unparallel love and devotion (to him).
    Unconditional Love

    Vaishnav Charan Das answers why Krishna did not marry Radha: “To teach us mortals what is unconditional and eternal love…”
    The Highest Form Of Love

    Lia Dee shares: Krishna did not marry Radha “because it is the highest form of love, according to Vedic scriptures…”
    Radha Refused Marriage?

    Sanchary Ghosh writes: “According to one version, Radha refused to marry Krishna because she felt that she would not fit in a palace. She thought no one would respect a cowgirl. People would expect Krishna to marry a princess. Though he tried to reassure her (otherwise), she was firm in her decision…”
    Soul Mates

    Prajakta Bhide shares: “I had read somewhere that Radha asked Krishna why he wouldn’t marry her. And he simply said: “How can one marry his or her own soul?”.

    Spiritual Love Is Ecstatic

    Elsewhere, Vraja Kishor writes: “To understand Radha correctly, you need to somewhat understand the mysteries of “rasa” and “prema” – the ecstatic experience of spiritual love. Krishna and Radharani playfully married once, as children sometimes do. They did not really marry, however, because their love is more primal, profound, and unbounded than what wedded love facilitates. Wedded love is a very elevated type of divine union, yet in marriage, the intimacy and spontaneity is not limitless.”
    Profound Love

    Kishor continues: “Some limitation is imposed by the sense of ‘duty’ that husband and wife naturally acquire towards one another. This sense of duty is beautiful, but the highest type of love is even more beautiful. It is so profound that it requires no sense of duty – and flows absolutely spontaneously – breaking all things that stand in its path. Thus, the pure transcendental love that Radha and Krishna enjoy on the highest level of bliss (paramānanda), expresses itself in the form of being paramours, not husband and wife…

    Marriage Unnecessary

    In another discussion, Awal Garg writes: Krishna and Radha were attached to each other mentally. That’s why we say Radhe-Krishna and not Rukmini-Krishna. Rukmini had done a lot of work to acquire Krishna. She had gone against her brother Rukmi because Rukmani, like Radha, was in love with Krishna. Rukmini sent a letter to Krishna that he should come and take her away. The letter was composed of 7 glistening shlokas. They touched Krishna’s heart and he had to accept Rukmini’s plea and make her his first wife. The marriage of Radha and Krishna, on the other hand, doesn’t really matter because they were bound by eternal love.
    A Curse Kept The Lovers Apart

    Jabahar says: “Lord Krishna and Radha are eternal lovers who dwell in Goloka. As per BrahmaVaivarta Purana, before the manifestation of their time on earth, Radharani had a heated argument with Shridama, the personal attendant of Krishna. Radharani got angry and cursed Shridama to take birth as a demon. Shridama, in turn, cursed Radharani to be born as a human who, after her pastimes with Krishna in Gokula, would get separated for 100 years from her beloved lover.

  29. stuti

    Why is sathi (di) insulting the gods ? Plz plz don’t do that dear if u can’t respect the gods at least don’t insult them. Think about the ppl who respect and worship

  30. Pls don’t undertimte di ….. There will be a reason behind every leela of Vishnu which we can’t get to know. And there is no mistake of doing puja for shivaling. If u don’t like this then pls don’t say anything about this . yes I know everyone are different in their thoughts, but thoughts should not affect anyone’s choice or idea . so sorry for irritating or hurting u ! 🙁

  31. Sanjana

    And for draupdi I hope u are clear and shivlinga u need to ask question so let’s move on
    And Arjun did have many wives but polyandry was in practice at that time and about subhadra when in vanvas he was not obliged to any promise so Krishna helped Arjun. The pandavas most of the marriages were for political reasons whereas draupdi marriage was not and true love existed. See reading epics is not enough u need to choose the right . And Krishna the woman’s life were destroyed for they were in captive but he showed the world that everybody has the right to live

    Sita and ram
    Ram asked Sita to do Agnipariksha bcoz of 2 reasons one is maya Sita and the other is he knew the narrow mindset of people. And it surely was not his doubt on Sitas character and that is evident if u read any version. And about her banishment people blamed agnipariksha to be false and it was bcoz the people were insecure about the fact that woman would become more empowered. And it was the washerman who started but of course all people felt same. It was a kings duty to explain his Praja but they understood only after Sita went inside the earth. He knew explanations wouldn’t change them they questioned janaki and lost their happiness and that made the Praja learn and ram sent Sita to valmiki ashram and he was there with her in the form of luv and kush. If he hadn’t sent Sita people would say their King was blind in love and he will lose respect and if he loses respect them Praja won’t listen to him. Ram rajya was perfect is to be noted and he showed what a queen means and how a leader has to sacrifice not the workers. He was personally unhappy but life went on and that is also a lesson for life. And they didn’t have to be together they understood each other. Sita and ram were same so instead of Pati dharm why raj dharm was given importance for it was like for the well being of society than a individual and of course Sita did a ultimate sacrifice and I don’t deny that fact but of course ram wasn’t happy
    To be continued…,. With more reasons
    And ps of course siya sacrificed but she never harboured any negative feeling for ram

    And pls I know many disagree as even I am a feminist but from Rams view I can think of only such reasons

  32. Sanjana

    We don’t do idol worship we see God in the idol and worship and there are reasons why shiva is worshipped as linga. See just as we have air everywhere but we need fan to experience it we see God in idols and worship maybe u don’t believe but in our lives the prayes are bearing fruits

    And just now saw ur comment yesterday update see freedom of opinion is there but ur opinion can’t hurt our feelings and u can’t use words such as stupid we create stories and worship lords oh really
    And there are many archaeological findings to prove Ramayan happened and also the stories created as u say give us a lot of values knowledge and fill our lives with purity and see ram banished Sita but their love and union was really beautiful and even today our marriages pandits say mantras regarding Sita ram. So don’t think u can spread atheism. Love is filled with sacrifice and Sita is no different. And ps u say Hinduism is stupid but dont u think same for God I am telling for ur God maybe ur opinion would not change but trust me not believing in God is like leading ur life path less
    God bless u
    And Hinduism if these ur thoughts I can change it for that’s ur fate
    See the light of lives religion and if u really wanted justification for questions u would have questioned in a better manner but it seems u are dead against then it seems u respect only ur opinion u don’t want to give a thought neither do I
    Religion is a faith with many rooms especially rooms of doubt neither are we blind followers but mind ur language
    Hinduism I can only say read a few books then have ur say and u must check out a few analysis on Skr we made
    But u are not against Ramji it seems u are against Hindu gods
    Jai siya ram

    Tu moderators I request u to edit comments which insult Sita ram and Ramayan
    Like stupid is a bad word and pls take a note of my complaint and I hope such mistakes is not repeated
    Thank u

  33. Sanjana

    Dear sathi half knowledge is dangerous so without knowing fully atleast listen to us
    But u seem to be on a questioning spree

    And Riya yes laxman Sita relation is beautiful and he did not hold grudge for Sita bcoz he understood her love for Ram Sita does scold but even our mothers do but laxman was much better son than all of us na
    Welcome dear Riya to Skr family

  34. Sanjana

    And if the old members were there they would have answered better dear sathi hangout sisters if u see this pls tell ur opinions for u were the charmers of this family
    Miss u all only in tu

  35. Sanjana

    Can I ask u guys something
    Can we discuss sati sacrifice
    Can u tell me what was satis ultimate sacrifice I know but is it giving up her life due to insult by her father and what was the significance pls tell significance of this incident
    And the love she had for shiva and the penance she did for that

  36. stuti

    Sathi di plz read the comments, ramayan mahabharat books b4 asking sumthin and I also advise u to think b4 u act ….. sry if I hurt u but ur comments nd questions r hurting us

  37. athira

    nice priya.
    dear sathi , please don’t underestimate our epics and believes.
    it was Draupadi’s stuation to marry the Pandavas and krishna the fate seperated radha and krishna. Even today the world takes the name RADHAKRISHNA just like SIYA KE RAM.
    So sorry to say, but your post really hurts…

  38. athira

    pls dear,
    don’t hurt our feelings and believes.Draupadi is a pure soul and please don’t call her a cheap one.she is the one who suffered everything that a women would suffer in her lifetime.Krisha considered his devotees to be his wife . for a women protection from her husband is most imp.
    the devotees considered krishna as their husband they will be protected by him.How can you say that the pooja of SHIVLING is disgusting?
    so sorry but it really hurts..
    After a long days I am posting comment , but when i see this i was so sad
    if it hurts you i am sorry………..

  39. Siya

    Hii sathi u will not understand any of this so many have given u ans… Leave it u can do Google…. Pls don’t ask this kind of question…. Because our believe in God is much… So pls…

  40. Especially to ”Sathi”
    If you cannot believe on other’s belief just respect in it. Don’t you forget your limits and our dedication and selfless love towards our gods or any god. Draupadi is purer than purity itself. Have u ever thought about the situations and struggles faced by her. And you have no ryt to tell what others have to do or not.
    Everything happened was writtened in her fate and it has to be happened
    Both Lord Krishna and Rama were the avataars of Lord Vishnu determine and working according to the situations.
    I’m requesting tellyupdates not to post the comments like ”Sathi” did as we will not let anyone to play with our feelings and devotion towards God.

      • thejashri aka brindha

        Yes dear I am not going to reply her again. And her cmnts will never change our faith on God n Goddess.
        I end up cmnt to her cmnts. Today is the first time I hv never seen such a person who is insulting other religion.

  41. Hi guys ..so much negativity is hear uhhh. …..just ignore the negative comments and enjoy the positivity…….and sathi ur most welcome hear……keep commenting because of u our friends r back and comments also started increasing. …….be careful u have many enemies but I’m not because it’s public we all have rights to comment hear by all see u all on 16 …PRAY FOR MY RESULT PLEASE ….????

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Yup di v r praying fr results.. May u b d topper. V know u ll rck it.. N hw cn u say thnx to sathi di.. Didn’t u c hw she ill mouthed our gods?

  42. Ishita

    Hey sathi
    All skr and mb fans are angry on u
    Please respect their feelings and do read my comment on yesterday’s page
    And mam every1 has freedom to express ur thoughts
    U r most welcome but dont use such harsh words that may hurt any1
    I think u must have understood now
    Thanku for reading my comment

    • Ishita

      Hi skr family
      Missed u all ❤
      There are many newcomers here
      Welcome ?
      And every1 srry
      I know its not allowed
      I hereby invite u all to join us on hangouts
      And ur unity is awesome??????

  43. sathi

    sorry for hurting u.but what is right can not be denied….your religion only teach to make relationship before marriage…How can a women make relationship without marrying him…is it right!

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      It’s gud u said sry.. Bt y r u seeing it frm wrong angle di.? Our religion nt told us dat v also mk relationship b4 marriage n vice versa.. ok ? n thnx for saying sorry.. It’s okay but only if u don’t abuse any mythological characters hereafter.

    • Srinidhi

      It’s ok to ask questions, but I just want to request you to be respectful when you do so…and I have answered your questions as a reply to your first comment on May 12th’s page. Sorry if I have hurt you in any way…

  44. sathi

    OH really shivani will u tell me who is fake!who are fake call other fake..mind ur language….

    • U don’t say that first u mind it!!!!! And u r making me to loose my patience u couldn’t realise that u r wrong but u r insulting our family member….

      Sry if I had hurt u …but I won’t be quite if u speak against our family member….

    • thejashri aka brindha

      First u started insulting other religion and now u r insulting our family member. Pls mind ur language…. Sry but it really hurts…..

    • dhruv

      Shame on u to talk abt draupadi sita ram n all gods…
      Its not owr fault it’s ur own mentality..3rd class…

    • dhruv

      Hey hey sathi don’t u dare to talk abt shivani ok. Look at urself 1st..
      N if ur saying tht those who say othrs r bad r themselves bad..
      Then ur insulting our gods bt u urself r cheap..do u kno shivani???who r u to tlk abt her..
      N yea shame on u to insult our gods..u dnt evn know wht is meaning of god n wht hv they done..
      People like u r everywhere. shame on u forinsulting gods..

    • Thanmathi

      Sathi I’m glad that you asked sry but dear pls mind ur language dear u hve right to comment on a public website but it doesn’t mean you can talk rudely to others 1st 2 priya and now 2 shivani we can’t here v share a bond which makes us a family u can’t allow ur family member 2 get insulted right same feeling here 2 thanks for commenting coz many of our old members commented here coz of u even though u hurt us u did good 2 us in some way there’s an option submit ur article in this page plz post all ur questions as a separate article so that we can answer them

  45. Guys I know I was really rude to sati…. But I don’t know how to make her realize that she s wrong….. And I wanted to ignore her but she refered my name there so that I cmntd….

    I m sry guys if anybody felt I was wrong…….

    I m sry sati if I had hurted u but ur all cmnts hurtes us a lot….

    I m sry once again guys!!!!!!!!!

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      No need to say sorry di.. D one who must say sorry for insulting is and our mythology must say sorry.. Not u.. Sathi di u deserve it.. N if u wanna ask qn, no one would hv been angry ?.. But u insulted god.. So v r ngry. N I dnt think v r rong to scold sathi di.. I ll kip on scolding u if u didn’t control.. N yes sorry if hurt any other family member

  46. stuti

    Guys no fighting here and sathi plz don’t talk about this anymore if u don’t believe in gods at least don’t insult them think about the ppl who respect and worship them dear ….. I’m not telling that u don’t hv rights to say so but ur comments really hurt and create problems sry if I hurt u.

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Sati di I m losing my patience n if u didn’t stop den all mmbrs will lose their patience.. I am mega angry wid u fr insulting lord Vishnu n Krishna, ram , Draupadi, Shiva etc..

  47. stuti

    Dear sisters plz don’t forget that sathi is also our sis nd its our duty to correct her so sathi ur questions are right but plz ask them in a right way ….. not by insulting the gods and mythology stories …… I apologize to u and admit that I was rude to u ……

  48. stuti

    I lost my patience and wrote ill about u …. really sry u r free 2 ask ques but ask in right way nd plz don’t insult our gods dear u inturn will get insulted understand ……

  49. Vanshika crzy fr skr

    Guys I thnk I’ll not read d comments any more nw n not comment coz I can’t tolerate ask this insult now.. If sathi di didn’t stop it. I’ll stop commenting,. N don’t think sati that I’m skidding to stop u.. Okay.. N if u brk ur limits we’ll tell wat is real.. I hv nvr been so rude to anyone in my life.. But u hv forced me to.. Stop this nonsense.. Ur comments are like an arrow ? piercing our hearts.. Unbearable.. Hw cn u b so rude.? Sita ram, Radha Krishna, rukmini Krishna, Draupadi Arjun pandavas.. U r just too much.. ???????

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      I say sorry if I hurt u bcoz v feel bd n r nt hppy in hurting a prsn.. We follow religion and r proud of it.. I wuld lyk tho know frm where dese thoughts against ram sita Krishna Radha Arjun pandava panchali prevailed in ur mind…

    • Vanshika crzy fr skr

      Okay now its enough fighting for today i think.. Even if fate seperated Radha Krishna n siya ram, v pray ? to Dem together n so dey r together forever..

    • Oh y r u saying that u l leave this page bcoz of her…..don’t do that we should not separate our family bcoz of that cmnt….

  50. Vanshika crzy fr skr

    Guys u hv 2 options.. I m planning to write n ff on Bhavi or shushra.. U tell which one u want first.. Bharat Mandvi or shatrughan sutkirti? Plz tell me.. N nxt in siya k ram will continue ? as my holidays hv started so I’ll write two ff..

  51. Haripriya

    Hi all, what happened to u all ? I never thought u all will fight for that comment of sati . I know she disrespected gods but whatever she said she will get punishment from God . One thing there is only God who is worshipped by different names and religions. Every time someone gives bad comment . I hope u all don’t take it serious my dear sisters . One request please don’t reply to the person who gives bad comment

  52. dhruv

    Hey shivu no need to explain such people..they only like to fight..n want,some subjct..dear dnt talk to tht girl..

Your comment will now be reviewed first before it's published. Read more here..

Your comment will now be reviewed first before it's published. Read more here..